LEAP-UCD-2017 Comparison of Centrifuge Test Results

LEAP-UCD-2017 Comparison of Centrifuge Test Results
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_4
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Kutter;T. Carey;N. Stone;B. L. Zheng;Andreas G. Gavras;M. Manzari;M. Zeghal;T. Abdoun;E. Korre;S. Escoffier;S. Haigh;G. Madabhushi;S. Madabhushi;W. Hung;Ting-Wei Liao;Dong‐Soo Kim;Seong-Nam Kim;J. Ha;N. Kim;M. Okamura;Asri Nurani Sjafruddin;T. Tobita;K. Ueda;Ruben R. Vargas;Yan-Guo Zhou;Kai Liu
B. Kutter;T. Carey;N. Stone;B. L. Zheng;Andreas G. Gavras;M. Manzari;M. Zeghal;T. Abdoun;E. Korre;S. Escoffier;S. Haigh;G. Madabhushi;S. Madabhushi;W. Hung;Ting-Wei Liao;Dong‐Soo Kim;Seong-Nam Kim;J. Ha;N. Kim;M. Okamura;Asri Nurani Sjafruddin;T. Tobita;K. Ueda;Ruben R. Vargas;Yan-Guo Zhou;Kai Liu
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Kutter;T. Carey;N. Stone;B. L. Zheng;Andreas G. Gavras;M. Manzari;M. Zeghal;T. Abdoun;E. Korre;S. Escoffier;S. Haigh;G. Madabhushi;S. Madabhushi;W. Hung;Ting-Wei Liao;Dong‐Soo Kim;Seong-Nam Kim;J. Ha;N. Kim;M. Okamura;Asri Nurani Sjafruddin;T. Tobita;K. Ueda;Ruben R. Vargas;Yan-Guo Zhou;Kai Liu

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文对LEAP-UCD-2017各设施的实验结果进行了比较。指定的实验包括一个淹没在水中的5度坡度的中密度干净沙子,在刚性容器中受到1赫兹的斜正弦波基运动。为了确定响应(例如,位移、孔压)、震动强度和密度或相对密度之间的关系趋势的斜率,在不同的实验中有意地改变了地面运动和土壤密度。本文也旨在作为一个有用的起点来概述实验结果,并帮助其他人找到具体的实验,如果他们想要选择一个子集进行进一步的分析。实验结果表明它们之间存在显著差异,但响应与输入参数的已知变化具有显著的相关性,在R2~100.7~0.8之间。
This paper compares experimental results from every facility for LEAP-UCD-2017. The specified experiment consisted of a submerged medium-dense clean sand with a 5-degree slope subjected to 1 Hz ramped sine wave base motion in a rigid container. The ground motions and soil density were intentionally varied from experiment to experiment in hopes of defining the slope of the relational trend between response (e.g., displacement, pore pressure), intensity of shaking, and density or relative density. This paper is also intended to serve as a useful starting point for overview of the experimental results and to help others find specific experiments if they want to select a subset for further analysis. The results of the experiments show significant differences between each other, but the responses show a significant correlation,R2~ 0.7–0.8, to the known variation of the input parameters.