Depression, nondepression, and cognitive illusions: reply to Schwartz.
Depression, nondepression, and cognitive illusions: reply to Schwartz.
复制标题
抑郁、非抑郁和认知错觉：回复施瓦茨。
DOI：
10.1037//0096-3445.110.3.436
复制
发表时间：
1981
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Alloy,LB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Abramson,LY;Alloy,LB
回应B的评论。Schwartz（见记录1982-07491-001）对本作者的文章（见记录1981-02686-001）提出了质疑，Schwartz在文章中认为Alloy和Abramson的发现对习得性无助和抑郁症之间假设的因果关系提出了质疑。本文作者同意他的一般论点，即非抑郁症患者可能相对不受抑郁症的影响，并讨论了他们的数据对习得性无助理论和其他抑郁症认知理论的影响。施瓦茨的动机帐户抑郁症的准确性判断反应结果的偶然性也进行了评估。建议在讨论认知偏差时，区分错误、非理性和适应不良是很重要的。(55参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Responds to comments by B. Schwartz (see record 1982-07491-001) on the present authors' article (see record 1981-02686-001), in which Schwartz argued that the Alloy and Abramson findings call into question the hypothesized causal link between learned helplessness and depression. The present authors agree with his general contention that nondepressives may be relatively invulnerable to depression, and discuss the implications of their data for the learned helplessness theory and other cognitive theories of depression. Schwartz's motivational account of depressive accuracy in judging response–outcome contingencies is also evaluated. It is suggested that it is important to distinguish among error, irrationality, and maladaptiveness when discussing cognitive bias.(55 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)