Content Comparison of Worker Productivity Questionnaires in Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Conditions Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Framework
Content Comparison of Worker Productivity Questionnaires in Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Conditions Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Framework
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10926-009-9193-0
复制
发表时间：
2009-12-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Boonen, Annelies
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Escorpizo, Reuben;Cieza, Alarcos;Boonen, Annelies
背景工人生产力的结果是必不可少的，在检查关节炎和其他肌肉骨骼疾病的工人的康复。工人生产率问卷的内容差异很大。《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》（《功能、残疾和健康分类》）为描述和比较这些调查表的内容提供了参考。方法文献回顾确定发表的自我报告工人生产力问卷。所有有意义的概念都已确定，并根据既定规则与相应的ICF类别相联系。结果18份问卷共包含519个有意义的概念，并与64个独特的二级ICF类别相关联。所有调查问卷都涉及活动和参与，13份（72%）涉及身体功能，7份（39%）涉及环境因素，7份（39%）涉及个人因素，只有一份（6%）涉及身体结构部分。总体而言，工作角色功能（WRF）调查问卷解决了最多的不同类别，而数量和质量方法只包含一个ICF类别。风湿性关节炎-工作不稳定性量表的身体功能类别数量最多，工作活动限制量表和WRF的活动和参与类别数量最多。健康和劳动问题单中涉及无报酬工作参与的类别最多。健康和工作问卷是唯一包括环境和个人因素的情境化。结论自报式工人生产力问卷在内容上存在较大差异。这种内容分析研究可以指导我们为特定的研究问题选择合适的问卷。
Background Worker productivity outcome is essential in examining the rehabilitation of workers with arthritis and other musculoskeletal conditions. There is great variation in the contents of worker productivity questionnaires. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) offers the possibility to serve as a reference to describe and compare the contents of these questionnaires. Methods A literature review identified published self-report worker productivity questionnaires. All meaningful concepts were identified and linked to the corresponding ICF category according to established rules. Results Eighteen questionnaires were identified which contained a total of 519 meaningful concepts and which were linked to 64 unique 2nd level ICF categories. All questionnaires addressed Activities and Participation, thirteen (72%) addressed Body Functions, seven (39%) addressed Environmental Factors, seven (39%) addressed Personal Factors and only one questionnaire (6%) for Body Structures component. Overall, Work Role Functioning (WRF) questionnaire addressed the most number of different categories while Quantity and Quality method contained only one ICF category. The Rheumatoid Arthritis-Work Instability Scale had the highest number of categories for Body Functions, the Work Activity Limitations Scale and WRF had the most number of categories for Activities and Participation. The Health and Labour Questionnaire had the highest number of categories referring to unpaid work participation. The Health and Work Questionnaire was the only that included contextualization of both Environmental and Personal Factors. Conclusion Self-report worker productivity questionnaires differed largely in their contents. This content analysis study could guide us in selecting an appropriate questionnaire for a specific study question.