Hard and Unreal Advice: Mothers, Social Science and the Victorian Poverty Experts
Hard and Unreal Advice: Mothers, Social Science and the Victorian Poverty Experts
复制标题
艰难而虚幻的建议：母亲、社会科学和维多利亚时代的贫困专家
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Niall Curry
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Robbie Love;Niall Curry
这是一个新的和有洞察力的工作，旨在研究维多利亚和爱德华七世贫困专家的假设和方法。马丁教授回顾了由T. R.马尔萨斯、埃德温·查德威克、海伦·博桑奎特、查尔斯·布斯和比阿特丽斯·韦伯;通过这一点，马丁还旨在对爱德华·班菲尔德和查尔斯·默里等较新的贫困问题专家的工作提供结构性批评：“默里所做的，在非常真实的意义上，是维多利亚时代的社会科学。任何熟悉维多利亚时代贫困社会科学的人都能在默里对公共福利的分析中立即认识到其典型的关注点、技术、假设、盲点和行为模式。（一）
This is a fresh and perceptive work which seeks to examine the assumptions and methodology of Victorian and Edwardian poverty experts. Professor Martin reviews research undertaken by such familiar figures as T. R. Malthus, Edwin Chadwick, Helen Bosanquet, Charles Booth and Beatrice Webb; through this, Martin also aims to provide a structural critique of the work of more recent poverty experts such as Edward Banfield and Charles Murray: ‘What Murray is doing, in a very real sense, is Victorian social science. Anyone familiar with the Victorian social science of poverty recognizes immediately in Murray’s analysis of public welfare its typical concerns, techniques, assumptions, blind spots and behavioral models’ (p. vii).(1)