Zwei Entwicklungslinien einer Forschungstechnologie: Zur Geschichte der Analytischen Ultrazentrifugen und Gasultrazentrifugen

Zwei Entwicklungslinien einer Forschungstechnologie: Zur Geschichte der Analytischen Ultrazentrifugen und Gasultrazentrifugen
复制标题

研究技术发展的两条线:分析超速离心机和气体超速离心机的历史

DOI:
10.1007/s00048-015-0132-1
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Forstner
Forstner
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Helmbold;Forstner

文献摘要

相似文献

从历史的角度来看,根据Shinn和Joerges(Shinn and Joerges 2000,2002)的观点,超离心机通常被视为研究技术的完美范例。研究技术是由一个通用设备、它自己的度量以及与该设备相关的历史参与者的间隔性来定义的。本文详细分析了超速离心机的发展历程,揭示了两种不同的发展方向:分析型超速离心机和用于同位素分离的气体超速离心机。令人惊讶的是,我们找不到这两条线路的任何间隙和横向连接。这些生产线最终得到了两种基于两种不同技术概念的不同设备。此外,绝大多数演员都坚持一句台词。这些结果与其他作者一致,他们进一步发展了研究技术的概念,并试图明确它们的定义。
In a historical perspective the ultracentrifuge is often taken as perfect example of a research technology according to Shinn and Joerges (Shinn and Joerges 2000, 2002). Research technologies are defined by a generic device, its own metrology and the interstitiality of the historical actors connected with the device. In our paper we give a detailed analysis of the development of the ultracentrifuge and thereby reveal two different lines of development: analytical ultracentrifuges and gas ultracentrifuges used for isotope separation. Surprisingly, we could not find any interstitial and transversal connections for these two lines. The lines end up with two different devices based on two different technical concepts. Moreover, the great majority of the actors stick to one line. These results are in accordance with other authors, who developed the concept of research technologies further and tried to sharpen their definition.