Autobiographical memory specificity after manipulating retrieval cues in adults reporting childhood sexual abuse

Autobiographical memory specificity after manipulating retrieval cues in adults reporting childhood sexual abuse
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0021-843x.117.2.444
复制
发表时间:
2008-05-01
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Dalgleish, Tim
Dalgleish, Tim
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hauer, Beatrijs J. A.;Wessel, Ineke;Dalgleish, Tim

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

创伤样本有相对困难,在产生特定的自传体记忆的提示词任务相比,nonexposed控制。同时,创伤与日常生活中高度特定的侵入性创伤记忆有关。可能,日常入侵和记忆产生的线索词依赖于不同的检索过程,前者依赖于检索线索和特定的记忆表征之间的密切联系(直接检索),后者通过分层记忆系统的迭代检索周期(生成检索)。本研究探讨了这种区别使用两个版本的提示词任务,旨在促进生成和直接检索,分别在参与者或没有儿童性虐待(CSA)的历史。数据表明,CSA参与者的具体生成检索线索比nonabused控制,但这种差异消失了直接检索线索。这种相互作用是较强的CSA参与者相对较大的创伤后应激反应,并保持显着时,参与者与过去或目前的严重抑郁症被排除在外,也只有那些参与者与确证CSA被列入。
Traumatized samples have relative difficulty in generating specific autobiographical memories on a cue word task, compared to nonexposed controls. Simultaneously, trauma is associated with highly specific intrusive trauma memories in day-to-day life. Possibly, day-to-day intrusions and memories generated to cue words rely on different retrieval processes, with the former dependent on close associations between retrieval cues and specific memory representations (direct retrieval), and the latter on iterative retrieval cycles through a hierarchical memory system (generative retrieval). This study investigated this distinction using two versions of the cue word task, designed to promote generative and direct retrieval, respectively, in participants with or without a history of child sexual abuse (CSA). The data demonstrated that CSA participants were less specific than nonabused controls to generative retrieval cues, but this difference disappeared with direct retrieval cues. This interaction was stronger in CSA participants with relatively greater posttraumatic stress and remained significant when participants with past or current major depressive disorder were excluded and also when only those participants with corroborated CSA were included.