A Polish and German Population Study of Quality of Life, Well-Being, and Life Satisfaction in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
A Polish and German Population Study of Quality of Life, Well-Being, and Life Satisfaction in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyt.2020.585813
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Bidzan M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bidzan-Bluma I;Bidzan M;Jurek P;Bidzan L;Knietzsch J;Stueck M;Bidzan M
导读：在COVID-19大流行期间进行的心理学研究很少包括60岁或以上的人。在我们的研究中，我们研究了德国和波兰老年人在大流行期间的生活质量、幸福感和生活满意度（包括危险行为、特质焦虑、威胁感、睡眠质量和乐观）的预测因素，并将其与三个不同年龄组进行了比较。方法：共494名成人，分为- 60+ (N = 60)、50-60 （N = 139）、36-49 （N = 155）、<35 （N = 140）四组，完成有效的自我报告问卷，评估流行期间的社会人口统计数据、生活质量、特质焦虑、风险承受能力、冠状病毒威胁、对大流行的乐观态度、放松困难、生活满意度、幸福感和睡眠质量。结果:年长的人认为他们的生活质量更高的比年轻(平均差= 0.74,= 0.19,p < 0.01)和中年(平均差= 0.79,= 0.18,p < 0.01)的参与者,评价其生活满意度高于年轻(平均差= 1.23,= 0.31,p < 0.01)和中年(平均差= 0.92,= 0.30,p < 0.05)的参与者,评价他们的幸福感高于年轻(平均差= 1.40,= 0.31,p < 0.01)和中年(平均差= 0.91,= 0.31,P < 0.05)。与年轻年龄组相比，他们的特质焦虑和冠状病毒威胁水平也较低（平均差异=-9.19,SE = 1.90, p < 0.01）。与中年受访者相比，他们具有更大的风险承受能力（平均差异=1.38，SE=0.33, p < 0.01）、睡眠质量（F = 1.25; eta2 = 0.01）和乐观（F = 1.96; eta2 = 0.01），并且在大流行期间放松的难度更小（F = 3.75; eta2 = 0.02）。结论：大流行期间的生活质量、生活满意度和幸福感受年龄、特质焦虑和冠状病毒威胁的影响。在大流行期间，老年人对自己的生活质量、生活满意度和幸福感的评分高于年轻人，对特质焦虑和冠状病毒威胁的评分低于年轻人。与中年受访者相比，他们的风险承受能力更强，睡眠质量更好，更乐观，放松的难度也更小。
Introduction: Psychological studies undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic rarely include people in their 60s or older. In our study, we studied the predictors of quality of life, well-being, and life satisfaction (including risky behavior, trait anxiety, feeling of threat, sleep quality, and optimism) during the pandemic in older people from Germany and Poland and compared them to three different age groups. Methods: A total of 494 adults in four groups−60+ (N = 60), 50–60 (N = 139), 36–49 (N = 155), <35 (N = 140)—completed validated self-report questionnaires assessing: socio-demographic data, quality of life, trait anxiety, risk tolerance, Coronavirus threat, optimism regarding the pandemic, difficulty relaxing, life satisfaction, well-being, and sleep quality during the pandemic period. Results: Older people rated their quality of life higher than did young (mean difference=0.74, SE=0.19, p < 0.01) and middle-aged (mean difference=0.79, SE=0.18, p < 0.01) participants, rated their life satisfaction higher than young (mean difference=1.23, SE = 0.31, p < 0.01) and middle-aged (mean difference=0.92, SE = 0.30, p < 0.05) participants, and rated their well-being higher than young (mean difference=1.40, SE = 0.31, p < 0.01) and middle-aged (mean difference=0.91, SE = 0.31, p < 0.05) participants. They also experienced lower levels of trait anxiety and Coronavirus threat (mean difference=-9.19, SE = 1.90, p < 0.01) than the younger age groups. They experienced greater risk tolerance (mean difference=1.38, SE=0.33, p < 0.01), sleep quality (F =1 .25; eta2 = 0.01), and optimism (F = 1.96; eta2 = 0.01), and had less difficulty relaxing during the pandemic (F = 3.75; eta2 = 0.02) than middle-aged respondents. Conclusions: Quality of life, life satisfaction, and well-being during the pandemic is affected by age, trait anxiety, and Coronavirus threat. Older people rated their quality of life, life satisfaction, and well-being during pandemic higher than young people, and experienced lower levels of trait anxiety and Coronavirus threat than the younger age groups. They experienced greater risk tolerance, sleep quality, and optimism, and had less difficulty relaxing than middle-aged respondents.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1093/geronb/gbx171
发表时间：
2019-05-01
影响因子：
6.2
作者：
Durbin, Kelly A.;Barber, Sarah J.;Mather, Mara
通讯作者：
Mather, Mara
影响因子：
2
作者：
FERRANS, CE;POWERS, MJ
通讯作者：
POWERS, MJ
影响因子：
4
作者：
Chan, Angelique;Malhotra, Chetna;Ostbye, Truls
通讯作者：
Ostbye, Truls
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Gerst-Emerson, Kerstin;Jayawardhana, Jayani
通讯作者：
Jayawardhana, Jayani
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
D'Adamo, Heather;Yoshikawa, Thomas;Ouslander, Joseph G.
通讯作者：
Ouslander, Joseph G.