The dilemmas and uncertainties in assessing the societal impact of research
The dilemmas and uncertainties in assessing the societal impact of research
复制标题
评估研究的社会影响的困境和不确定性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Juha
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Juha
在2000年代，许多欧盟国家已经建立了研究影响评估实践，作为大学第三使命审查的一部分。芬兰的研究评估体系广泛采用了社会影响标准。在这项研究中，问题是影响评估依赖于什么指导原则。这一观点是基于为研究采访的专家的经验和意见。找到了指导评价目标和实际实施的4条影响评价隐含原则。由于社会利益和学术努力之间的有限解释，指导原则在社会和方法上存在一些困境。本研究建议评估学者在将<s:2>“全方位<e:1>”解决方案应用于学术领域之前，应考虑实际的社会目的与一致的评估方法方法。
In the 2000s, many European Union countries have established research impact assessment practices as part of the scrutiny of the third mission of universities. The Finnish research evaluation system has widely adopted a societal impact criterion. In this study, the question is what guiding principles does impact assessment rely on. This point of view is based on the experiences and opinions of experts interviewed for the study. Four implicit principles of impact assessment which guide assessment goals and practical implementations were found. The guiding principles have several social and methodological dilemmas due to liminal interpretations between social interests and academic endeavor. This study recommends that the evaluation scholars should consider the actual social purpose vis-A -vis consistent methodological approaches to assessment before applying ‘all-round’ solutions to scholarly fields.