Target cell-specific plasticity rules of NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission in the hippocampus.
Target cell-specific plasticity rules of NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission in the hippocampus.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3389/fncel.2023.1068472
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
5.3
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Long-term potentiation and depression of NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission (NMDAR LTP/LTD) can significantly impact synapse function and information transfer in several brain areas. However, the mechanisms that determine the direction of NMDAR plasticity are poorly understood. Here, using physiologically relevant patterns of presynaptic and postsynaptic burst activities, whole-cell patch clamp recordings, 2-photon laser calcium imaging in acute rat hippocampal slices and immunoelectron microscopy, we tested whether distinct calcium dynamics and group I metabotropic glutamate receptor (I-mGluR) subtypes control the sign of NMDAR plasticity. We found that postsynaptic calcium transients (CaTs) in response to hippocampal MF stimulation were significantly larger during the induction of NMDAR-LTP compared to NMDAR-LTD at the MF-to-CA3 pyramidal cell (MF-CA3) synapse. This difference was abolished by pharmacological blockade of mGluR5 and was significantly reduced by depletion of intracellular calcium stores, whereas blocking mGluR1 had no effect on these CaTs. In addition, we discovered that MF to hilar mossy cell (MF-MC) synapses, which share several structural and functional commonalities with MF-CA3 synapses, also undergoes NMDAR plasticity. To our surprise, however, we found that the postsynaptic distribution of I-mGluR subtypes at these two synapses differ, and the same induction protocol that induces NMDAR-LTD at MF-CA3 synapses, only triggered NMDAR-LTP at MF-MC synapses, despite a comparable calcium dynamics. Thus, postsynaptic calcium dynamics alone cannot predict the sign of NMDAR plasticity, indicating that both postsynaptic calcium rise and the relative contribution of I-mGluR subtypes likely determine the learning rules of NMDAR plasticity.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Danielson NB;Turi GF;Ladow M;Chavlis S;Petrantonakis PC;Poirazi P;Losonczy A
通讯作者:
Losonczy A
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Hedrick TP;Nobis WP;Foote KM;Ishii T;Chetkovich DM;Swanson GT
通讯作者:
Swanson GT
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Borgland, SL;Taha, SA;Bonci, A
通讯作者:
Bonci, A
影响因子:
13.8
作者:
Conn PJ;Lindsley CW;Jones CK
通讯作者:
Jones CK
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Chalifoux JR;Carter AG
通讯作者:
Carter AG