Competing visions: security of tenure and the welfarisation of English social housing

Competing visions: security of tenure and the welfarisation of English social housing
复制标题

相互竞争的愿景:保有权保障和英国社会住房的福利化

DOI:
10.1080/02673037.2017.1291916
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Fitzpatrick S
Fitzpatrick S
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fitzpatrick S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

最近,英国立法终止了对新理事会租户的保有权保障,这可能被视为美国式社会住房愿景的象征,即社会住房是一种临时福利服务,只为最贫困的人保留。但是,社会房东中存在阻力,其中许多人仍然致力于提供“生活之家”。此外,紧缩政策导致的削减意味着越来越多的依赖福利的家庭以负担能力为由被拒绝社会租赁。因此,一场关于英国社会住房是为了谁和为了什么的斗争已经准备就绪。基于大规模的定性研究,本文通过考虑自2012年以来实施的自由裁量FTT制度的房东和租户的经验,探讨了强制性延长定期租赁(FTT)的影响。我们的结论是,金融交易税的微薄可能的好处,在轻微增加租赁营业额方面,严重超过了租户的本体安全和房东的行政负担的不利影响。
Recent legislation ending security of tenure for new council tenants in England may be considered emblematic of a US-style vision of social housing as a temporary welfare service, reserved only for the very poorest. But there is resistance amongst social landlords, many of whom remain committed to providing ‘homes for life’. Moreover, austerity-driven cuts mean that benefit-dependent households are increasingly refused social tenancies on grounds of affordability. The stage is therefore set for a battle over who and what English social housing is for. Drawing on large-scale qualitative research, this paper interrogates the implications of the mandatory extension of fixed-term tenancies (FTTs) by considering landlord and tenant experiences of the discretionary FTT regime in place since 2012. We conclude that the meagre likely benefits of FTTs, in terms of marginally increased tenancy turnover, are heavily outweighed by the detrimental impacts on tenants’ ontological security and landlords’ administrative burden.
治理邻居:英国的反社会行为令和新的行为规范形式
DOI: --
发表时间: 2006
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Flint;J. Nixon
通讯作者: J. Nixon
无家可归者监测:英格兰 2012
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Fitzpatrick;Hal Pawson;G. Bramley;S. Wilcox
通讯作者: S. Wilcox
英国社会住房保有权保障
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
David Robinson;A. Walshaw
通讯作者: A. Walshaw
福利改革的不平衡影响:地方和人民的经济损失
DOI: 10.7190/cresr.2017.5563239352
发表时间: 2016
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
C. Beatty;S. Fothergill
通讯作者: S. Fothergill
英国的社会住房:检验改革的逻辑
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
David Robinson
通讯作者: David Robinson