Competing visions: security of tenure and the welfarisation of English social housing
Competing visions: security of tenure and the welfarisation of English social housing
复制标题
相互竞争的愿景:保有权保障和英国社会住房的福利化
DOI:
10.1080/02673037.2017.1291916
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Fitzpatrick S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fitzpatrick S
Recent legislation ending security of tenure for new council tenants in England may be considered emblematic of a US-style vision of social housing as a temporary welfare service, reserved only for the very poorest. But there is resistance amongst social landlords, many of whom remain committed to providing ‘homes for life’. Moreover, austerity-driven cuts mean that benefit-dependent households are increasingly refused social tenancies on grounds of affordability. The stage is therefore set for a battle over who and what English social housing is for. Drawing on large-scale qualitative research, this paper interrogates the implications of the mandatory extension of fixed-term tenancies (FTTs) by considering landlord and tenant experiences of the discretionary FTT regime in place since 2012. We conclude that the meagre likely benefits of FTTs, in terms of marginally increased tenancy turnover, are heavily outweighed by the detrimental impacts on tenants’ ontological security and landlords’ administrative burden.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Flint;J. Nixon
通讯作者:
J. Nixon
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. Fitzpatrick;Hal Pawson;G. Bramley;S. Wilcox
通讯作者:
S. Wilcox
影响因子:
1.5
作者:
David Robinson;A. Walshaw
通讯作者:
A. Walshaw
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
C. Beatty;S. Fothergill
通讯作者:
S. Fothergill
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
David Robinson
通讯作者:
David Robinson