Beauty in the Age of Empire
Beauty in the Age of Empire
复制标题
帝国时代的美丽
DOI:
10.7312/adal19120
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Raja Adal
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Raja Adal
On its own, the introduction of the brush into children’s art education in Japanese and Arabic designs in Egypt exemplifies “an aesthetic discourse of indigeneity,” writes Raja Adal; in a global comparative context, however, it “point[s] to more than the rise of national forms of aesthetic expression” (pp. 140–41). From a global perspective, the particular, articulated in aesthetic terms and cast as uniquely Japanese or distinctly Egyptian, emerges as decidedly mimetic. These transnational and global dynamics animate Adal’s impressively researched, lucidly argued, and elegantly written study of the histories of aesthetic education in Japan and Egypt from the 1870s to the end of World War II. The rise of border-crossing forms of knowledge is the most significant development in Japan studies in recent years, part of a powerful paradigm shift against the geopolitically driven approaches of “area studies,” for which the nation-state was the sole validating category and the teleologies of modernization theory the only framework. Current work in history, literature, and visual studies often places Japan within an East Asian context. Adal’s work exceeds this East Asian frame with its focus on aesthetic education in Japan and Egypt, two very different societies at the receiving end of Western expansion. The coeval transformations described in the book are traced not to direct contacts between Japan and Egypt but to the flow of texts, objects, and practices from the metropoles (Britain, France, and the United States). Common conditions also gave rise to common ideological reflexes, made attractive through aesthetic education. Beauty was outside the largely social Darwinist world order of imperialism; as Adal puts it, “If Western techniques were powerful, the indigenous self was beautiful” (p. 4). Adal’s investigation is also a response to Dipesh Chakrabarty’s call for “histories of the embodied practices of subjectivity.”1 Aesthetics is returned to its original Greek meaning of the sensory experience of perception, as elaborated by Immanuel Kant’s predecessor Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten. Adal’s history of aesthetic education is the history of music, writing, and art as curricular subjects that provided a cultural training of the senses and made enchanting a large spectrum of ideologies. His archive includes curricula, teaching materials, and the discourses of various actors (educators, bureaucrats, artists), with sources in Japanese, Arabic, English, and French. The two parts of the study are each framed by fascinating interludes: the first on the piano (an imperial and modern instrument par excellence, perfected by mechanical manufacturing), the second on national anthems (signatures of national uniqueness that are actually deeply mimetic). Part one deals with music and writing. Educators in both Japan and Egypt were aware of the corporeal effects of music and its powers of enchantment: they were in constant battle with the foreign, commercial, and vulgar melodies in the children’s soundscape. Writing, on the other hand, was instrumentalized along adopted Western