A collaborative operation decision model for distributed building clusters

A collaborative operation decision model for distributed building clusters
复制标题

分布式建筑集群协同运行决策模型

DOI:
10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.042
复制
发表时间:
2015-05
期刊:
影响因子:
9
通讯作者:
Yang Chen
Yang Chen
中科院分区:
工程技术1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rui Dai;Mengqi Hu;Dong Yang;Yang Chen

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在智能电网的背景下,建筑可以自由地与其他建筑连接形成集群,这被称为建筑集群,共享能量。然而,对于构建集群的最优运营策略以及在不同运营模式下针对不同措施对构建集群绩效进行评价的研究较少。因此,本研究提出了一种协同决策模型来研究建筑群之间的能量交换,这些建筑共用冷、热、电、蓄热和电池的联合系统,每个建筑的目标是最小化其能源成本、碳排放或一次能源消耗。提出了一种协同决策框架,用于获取建筑群的帕累托运营决策。我们比较了协作策略和非协作策略的性能,在非协作策略中,建筑物之间没有能量共享。结果表明,在并网和并网两种运行模式下,该协同策略均能显著降低能源成本、碳排放和一次能源消耗。动态定价方案下的协同策略比单一定价方案下的协同策略更具成本效益,说明动态定价方案下的协同策略能更有效地激励建筑更有效地利用共享能源。
In the context of smart grid, the building can freely connect with other buildings to form clusters which are termed as building clusters to share energy. However, less study is conducted to develop optimal operation strategy for building clusters and evaluate the performance of building clusters in terms of different measures under different operation modes. Therefore, this research proposes a collaborative decision model to study the energy exchange among building clusters where the buildings share a combined cooling, heating and power system, thermal storage, and battery, and each building aims to minimize its energy cost, carbon emission or primary energy consumption. A collaborative decision framework is proposed to obtain Pareto operation decisions for the building clusters. We compare the performance of the collaborative strategy with the non-cooperative strategy where no energy sharing among the buildings. It is demonstrated that the collaborative strategy can significantly reduce energy cost, carbon emission and primary energy consumption under both grid connected and disconnected operation modes. The collaborative strategy under dynamic pricing plan is more cost effective than the strategy under flat pricing plan, which indicates that the collaborative strategy can motive buildings to more efficiently utilize the shared energy under dynamic pricing plan.
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.069
发表时间: 2014-03
期刊: Energy
影响因子: 9
作者:
A. Facci;L. Andreassi;S. Ubertini
通讯作者: A. Facci;L. Andreassi;S. Ubertini
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.088
发表时间: 2013-12
期刊: Applied Energy
影响因子: 11.2
作者:
M. Bianchi;A. D. Pascale;F. Melino
通讯作者: M. Bianchi;A. D. Pascale;F. Melino
DOI: --
发表时间: 1972
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
P. Fanger
通讯作者: P. Fanger
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.004
发表时间: 2013-06
期刊: Energy
影响因子: 9
作者:
S. Bracco;Gabriele Dentici;S. Siri
通讯作者: S. Bracco;Gabriele Dentici;S. Siri
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.012
发表时间: 2009-12
期刊: Applied Energy
影响因子: 11.2
作者:
Heejin Cho;P. Mago;R. Luck;L. Chamra
通讯作者: Heejin Cho;P. Mago;R. Luck;L. Chamra