Onward for the freedom of others: marching beyond the AI ethics
Onward for the freedom of others: marching beyond the AI ethics
复制标题
为了他人的自由而前进：超越人工智能伦理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Terzis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Terzis
关于人工智能伦理的辩论汇集了不同的利益相关者，包括但不限于学者，政策制定者，首席执行官，活动家，工人代表，游说者，记者和“道德机器”。著名的政治机构为人工智能公司的“道德存在”制定了原则，而科技巨头则在一系列自我编写的指导方针中记录了道德规范。与此同时，一个大型社区开始蓬勃发展，专注于如何在技术上将道德参数嵌入算法系统。本文以西蒙娜·德·波伏娃和让-保罗·波普尔的哲学著作为基础，探讨了“人工智能伦理”辩论的哲学二律背反以及“公平讨论”的概念迷失。通过将存在主义哲学引入对话，本文试图挑战功利主义的辩证垄断，并为已经耀眼的人工智能竞技场带来新的曙光。为什么“人工智能道德准则”是一场注定要危险抽象的徒劳之战？这场战争如何损害我们的集体自由感？哪一个是被“人工智能伦理”讨论的烟雾所掩盖的令人不安的现实？最终，还有什么选择？似乎有一条不同的途径来讨论和实施道德;一条将他人的自由置于可持续和对所有人开放的未来之战的中心的途径。
The debate on the ethics of Artificial Intelligence brought together different stakeholders including but not limited to academics, policymakers, CEOs, activists, workers' representatives, lobbyists, journalists, and 'moral machines'. Prominent political institutions crafted principles for the 'ethical being' of the AI companies while tech giants were documenting ethics in a series of self-written guidelines. In parallel, a large community started to flourish, focusing on how to technically embed ethical parameters into algorithmic systems. Founded upon the philosophical work of Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre, this paper explores the philosophical antinomies of the 'AI Ethics' debate as well as the conceptual disorientation of the 'fairness discussion'. By bringing the philosophy of existentialism to the dialogue, this paper attempts to challenge the dialectical monopoly of utilitarianism and sheds fresh light on the -already glaring- AI arena. Why is 'the AI Ethics guidelines' a futile battle doomed to dangerous abstraction? How this battle can harm our sense of collective freedom? Which is the uncomfortable reality that remains obscured by the smoke-gas of the 'AI Ethics' discussion? And eventually, what's the alternative? There seems to be a different pathway for discussing and implementing ethics; A pathway that sets the freedom of others at the epicenter of the battle for a sustainable and open to all future.