Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: Regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly
Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: Regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1727
复制
发表时间：
1997-12-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Berent, I
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Berent, I
在词汇决定任务中，通过比较两个标记：规则效应和语音启动，考察了组合音素在英语阅读中的贡献。策略控制是通过操纵箔片的语音词汇来评估的：实验1使用合法的非单词，而实验2使用假同音字。复制已有的发现，在存在合法的非词语的情况下，获得了零规律性效应。只有在准确度上，用假同音箔观察到适度的规律性效应。相反，无论是否存在规律性效应，在每个实验中都出现了语音启动效应。因此，拼凑的音系学在强烈阻碍阅读的条件下限制了阅读。然而，规律性效应并不是它存在的必要证据。用双循环模型讨论了规律性和语音启动效应的分离。
The contribution of assembled phonology in reading English was examined in the lexical decision task by comparing two markers: regularity effects and phonological priming. Strategic control was assessed by manipulating the phonological lexicality of the foils: Experiment 1 used legal nonwords, whereas Experiment 2 used pseudohomophones. Replicating existing findings, null regularity effects were obtained in the presence of legal nonwords. Modest regularity effects, in accuracy only, were observed with pseudohomophone foils. In contrast, phonological priming effects emerged in each of the experiments, regardless of the presence of regularity effects. Assembled phonology thus constrains reading under conditions that strongly discourage its use. However, regularity effects are not necessary evidence for its presence. The dissociation of regularity and phonological priming effects is discussed in terms of the two-cycles model.