A Comparison Study of the Nutrient Fluxes in a Newly Impounded Riverine Lake (Longjing Lake): Model Calculation and Sediment Incubation
A Comparison Study of the Nutrient Fluxes in a Newly Impounded Riverine Lake (Longjing Lake): Model Calculation and Sediment Incubation
复制标题
新蓄水河道湖泊(龙井湖)营养盐通量对比研究:模型计算与沉积物孵化
DOI:
10.3390/w14132015
复制
发表时间:
2022-06
期刊:
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Hong Zhang
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cheng Du;Yan’an Pan;Wenzhong Tang;Qiansheng Yue;Hong Zhang
Diffusion flux is an essential tool to estimate the contribution of internal nitrogen and phosphorus in eutrophic lakes. There are mainly two methods, i.e., model calculation based on in-situ porewater sampling and water quality monitoring in laboratory incubation. The results obtained by the two methods are rarely compared, decreasing the validity of internal contribution and following management strategies. In this study, sediment samples were collected from a lake in China, then the fluxes were estimated by model calculation and laboratory incubation. The results show that there is an order of magnitude difference in the fluxes measured by these two methods. The mean values of ammonia (NH4+-N) and soluble reactive phosphate (SRP) obtained from the model calculations were 24.4 and 1.30, respectively. The mean values of NH4+-N and SRP obtained in the undisturbed group of sediment incubation were 7.84 and 5.47, respectively, and in the disturbed group of sediment incubation were 16.2 and 4.06, respectively. Sediment incubation is a combination of multiple influencing factors to obtain fluxes, while porewater model is based on molecular diffusion as the theoretical basis for obtaining fluxes. According to the different approaches of the two methods, sediment incubation is recommended as a research tool in lake autochthonous release management when the main objective is to remove pollution, while the porewater model is recommended as a research tool when the main objective is to control pollution. When assessing the diffusive flux of nitrogen, it is recommended to choose the stable form of total dissolved nitrogen to discuss the flux results.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Yuanyun Wei;Manyin Zhang;L. Cui;Xu Pan;Weiwei Liu;Wei Li;Yinru Lei
通讯作者:
Yuanyun Wei;Manyin Zhang;L. Cui;Xu Pan;Weiwei Liu;Wei Li;Yinru Lei
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Mengyuan Zhu;G. Zhu;Linlin Zhao;Xin Yao;Yunlin Zhang;G. Gao;B. Qin
通讯作者:
Mengyuan Zhu;G. Zhu;Linlin Zhao;Xin Yao;Yunlin Zhang;G. Gao;B. Qin
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Zongbao Yao;Liu Yang;Na Song;Changhui Wang;Helong Jiang
通讯作者:
Helong Jiang
影响因子:
12.8
作者:
Ma, Shuo-Nan;Wang, Hai-Jun;Jeppesen, Erik
通讯作者:
Jeppesen, Erik
影响因子:
11.4
作者:
Eek, Espen;Cornelissen, Gerard;Breedveld, Gijs D.
通讯作者:
Breedveld, Gijs D.