How carryover has an effect on recovery measures related to the area under the curve : theoretical and experimental investigations using cardiovascular parameters

How carryover has an effect on recovery measures related to the area under the curve : theoretical and experimental investigations using cardiovascular parameters
复制标题

残留如何影响与曲线下面积相关的恢复指标:使用心血管参数进行理论和实验研究

DOI:
10.1007/s11517-011-0744-0
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Kato Y
Kato Y
中科院分区:
工程技术3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sawada Y;Kato Y

文献摘要

相似文献

本研究探讨了心血管从精神压力中的恢复。本研究的主要目的是探讨是否存在遗留效应,即应激任务结束时观察到的最终反应对后续恢复的影响。最近提倡的回收措施有关的曲线下面积,平均回收率(MRR),进行了研究,比较这类的两个亲戚,总携带(TCO)和曲线下面积(AUC)。在开始时,每一项措施进行了详细的理论制定,从其最初的定义。据预测,MRR(而非TCO或AUC)可能不受残留效应影响。接下来,88名男性学生进行了5分钟的心算,在此期间测量血压和心率。几乎所有的理论预测(即,两个心血管参数的三种恢复措施为5/6)得到实验数据的支持。只有一个例外:对于心率,甚至MRR与最终反应性也存在比例关系。在恢复期迷走神经反弹被认为是这种矛盾的主要贡献者。这些结果的影响,在恢复研究的未来方向的理解进行了讨论。
This study examines cardiovascular recovery from mental stress. Investigating the absence or presence of carryover effect, the effect of the final reactivity observed at the end of stressful task on the successive recovery, was the major objective. A recently advocated recovery measure related to the area under the curve, mean recovery rate (MRR), was investigated, comparing with the two relatives of this type, total carryover (TCO) and literally area under the curve (AUC). At the onset, a detailed theoretical formulation of each measure was carried out, starting from its original definition. It was predicted that MRR, but not TCO or AUC, could be free from the carryover effect. Next, 88 male students underwent a 5-min mental arithmetic during which blood pressure and heart rate were measured. Nearly all the theoretical predictions (i.e., 5/6 for the three recovery measures by two cardiovascular parameters) were supported by experimental data. There was only one exception: for heart rate, there was a proportional relationship even for MRR versus the final reactivity. Vagal rebound in the recovery period was conceived as the main contributor of this contradiction. The implications of these results for the understanding of future directions in recovery studies are discussed.