Intersecting Ecosystem Services Across the Aquatic Continuum: From Global Change Impacts to Local, and Biologically Driven, Synergies and Trade-Offs
Intersecting Ecosystem Services Across the Aquatic Continuum: From Global Change Impacts to Local, and Biologically Driven, Synergies and Trade-Offs
复制标题
跨水生连续体的交叉生态系统服务：从全球变化影响到本地和生物驱动的协同效应和权衡
DOI：
10.3389/fevo.2021.628658
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
F. Pomati
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. D’Alelio;L. Russo;B. Hay Mele;F. Pomati
生态系统服务的研究需要整合不同的观测点。水尤其如此，因为这一要素不断循环，增加了不同生态系统中各种服务之间相互作用的机会。然而，在历史上，水生科学家以不同的方式研究内陆/淡水和开放/海洋沃茨，这种文化上的分歧可能会阻碍综合方法。在此，我们探索了过去23年中与生态系统服务有关的文献，分析了4，590篇水生论文。通过使用文本挖掘和主题网络方法聚合和交叉本文集合中包含的主题，我们看到对当地环境条件的研究（例如，河口管理）以及服务之间的协同作用和权衡（例如，碳固存和水净化）可以显示淡水科学和海洋科学之间的若干潜在概念联系。我们的分析表明，交叉生态系统服务的水生连续体，海洋和淡水科学之间的概念整合必须得到加强，特别是在不同的“盐度领域”之间的接口。这种整合应采取“系统思维”的观点，其中的重点是多个社会生态过程引起的相互作用是（一）生物介导的，（二）潜在的冲突，（三）在网络中纠缠。
The study of ecosystem services requires the integration of different observational points. This is particularly true in Water, as this element continuously cycles, increasing chances of interaction among services originating in different ecosystems. However, aquatic scientists historically approached the study of inland/freshwater and open/marine waters in different ways and this cultural division potentially hampers integrative approaches. Herein, we explored the literature pertaining to ecosystem services across the last 23 years, analysing 4,590 aquatic papers. By aggregating and intersecting topics included in this papers’ collection using text-mining and topical network approaches, we saw that the study of local environmental conditions (e.g., river estuary management) and synergies and trade-offs between services (e.g., carbon sequestration and water purification) can display several potential conceptual links between freshwater and marine sciences. Our analyses suggest that to intersect ecosystem services across the aquatic continuum, the conceptual integration between marine and freshwater science must be reinforced, especially at the interface between different “salinity realms.” Such integration should adopt a “system thinking” perspective, in which the focus is on multiple socio-ecological processes giving rise to interactions that are (i) biologically mediated, (ii) potentially conflicting, and (iii) entangled within networks.
影响因子：
11.5
作者：
Sara, G.;Mangano, M. C.;Helmuth, B.
通讯作者：
Helmuth, B.
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Yang, Shi Lun;Luo, Xiangxin;Gao, Shu
通讯作者：
Gao, Shu