Structure of this report

Structure of this report
复制标题

DOI:
10.3310/hta17020
复制
发表时间:
2013-01-01
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Montgomery, A. A.
Montgomery, A. A.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Salisbury, C.;Foster, N. E.;Montgomery, A. A.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这项研究是基于一项随机对照试验(RCT)的PhysioDirect相比,通常的护理,纳入经济评估和嵌套的定性research.The报告开始的问题,获得物理治疗和审查的新方法,以改善获得物理治疗和使用基于电话的服务在其他相关的背景下的研究背景的摘要。第一章最后介绍了研究目标,然后介绍了随机对照试验的方法和结果,接着介绍了经济分析的方法和结果,最后介绍了定性研究的方法和结果。稍微不寻常的是,有关护理过程中的变量的结果之前的主要和次要的结果进行了描述,因为这使得它更容易解释这些outcomes.The最后一章总结和综合的研究结果,从所有三个组成部分,提供解释在以前的研究。它还讨论了研究的优势和局限性及其对NHS和其他医疗保健系统的普遍性。最后对今后的研究提出了建议。
This study was based on a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of PhysioDirect compared with usual care, incorporating an economic evaluation and nested qualitative research.The report begins with a summary of the background to the problem of access to physiotherapy and a review of research on new approaches to improving access to physiotherapy and the use of telephone-based services in other relevant contexts. The first chapter concludes with a description of the research objectives.The report then describes the methods and results from the RCT, followed by the methods and results from the economic analysis and then the methods and results from the qualitative research. Slightly unusually, the findings about the variables relating to the process of care are described before the results about the primary and secondary outcomes, because that makes it easier to interpret these outcomes.The final chapter summarises and synthesises the findings from all three components of the study, providing interpretation in the light of previous studies. It also discusses the strengths and limitations of the research and its generalisability to the NHS and to other health-care systems. The conclusions are followed by recommendations for future research.