Social Capital, Impartiality and the Welfare State: An Institutional Approach
Social Capital, Impartiality and the Welfare State: An Institutional Approach
复制标题
社会资本、公正性和福利国家：制度方法
DOI：
10.1057/9781403979544_10
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
D. Stolle
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bo Rothstein;D. Stolle
本章将进一步阐明社会资本的一个重要方面，即广义信任的来源。迄今为止，关于社会资本来源的大多数讨论都集中在公民社会领域。参与志愿协会和非正式网络的人越多，他们就越信任他人（Putnam 1993，2000）。这种方法是有问题的，因为没有成功的社会资本理论将公民生活的各个方面与微观和宏观层面的信任联系起来。前几章已经表明，在微观层面上，志愿协会不一定是公民价值观和态度的生产者，如普遍信任（例如，Mayer，Wollebaek和Selle（参见Stolle 2001; Uslaner 2002）。此外，很难区分对他人产生不信任的网络，例如犯罪或种族主义组织，以及可能产生信任的网络，例如家长教师协会或童子军（然而，Hooghe试图在本卷中进行区分）。
This chapter sheds more light on the sources of one important aspect of social capital, namely generalized trust. Most discussions about the sources of social capital thus far have been focused on the realm of civil society. The more people are engaged in voluntary associations and informal networks, the more trusting toward other people they will become (Putnam 1993, 2000). This approach is problematic because there is no successful theory of social capital that links aspects of civic life and trust at the micro- and macrolevels. Previous chapters have shown that, at the microlevel, voluntary associations do not necessarily work as producers of civic values and attitudes, such as generalized trust (e.g., Mayer, Wollebaek and Selle this volume; see also Stolle 2001; Uslaner 2002). In addition, it is difficult to distinguish between networks that produce distrust toward others, for example criminal or racist organizations, and networks that potentially produce trust, such as Parent-Teacher Associations or the Boy Scouts (however, Hooghe tries to make this distinction in this volume).