Real-Time Effective Monitoring and Control in Oil and Gas Industry Using SCADA Technology as a Management Tool
Real-Time Effective Monitoring and Control in Oil and Gas Industry Using SCADA Technology as a Management Tool
复制标题
以SCADA技术为管理工具的石油天然气行业实时有效监控
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
O. Eseosa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Akinwale Eso;O. Eseosa
管道泄漏检测，如果不迅速/及时处理，可能会导致生命和财产损失。研究表明，控制或大幅减少这些损失的最佳手段是通过使用DCS和CAO-SCADA技术作为管理工具进行实时监控。这项工作采用了该工具，然后将其应用于尼日利亚的一个特定的石油和天然气终端。产生研究问题，获得的数据以及使用的研究工具进行了验证。共有135名受访者参与了这项研究。从基于z检验的公式化检验中，研究了HO1、HO2和HO3三个假设。HO1检验管道故障是由于管道沿线泄漏造成的假设，以及泄漏检测是由于管道沿线没有DSC、CAO-SCADA管理工具造成的假设。结果表明，计算出的z值小于临界值1.96，显著水平为0.05。从得到的结果来看，假设HO1被接受，因此该管道的失败是因为DSO， CAO-SCADA不存在于系统中。HO2测试确定DSC和CAO-SCADA系统之间是否存在显著差异。从结果来看，计算出的z值为0.0065，小于临界值1。这意味着零假设（HO2）被接受。这意味着CAO-SCADA与DCO在管道的有效管理、监测和安全运行方面没有显著差异。最后一个假设是检验DCS系统与CAO-SCADA系统对管道泄漏的有效控制是否存在显著差异。在135名（100%）回答者中，106名（78.52%）表示同意，12.59%表示部分同意。4人（5.18%）理解清楚，5人（0.0370%）对建议不感兴趣。
Pipeline leakage detection, if not addressed swiftly/promptly, could result to loss of lives and properties. Researches have shown that the best means of curbing or drastically minimizing these losses is through real time monitoring using DCS and CAO-SCADA Technology as the management tool. This tool was adopted in this work and then applied to a particular oil and gas terminal in Nigeria. Research questions were generated and data obtained as well as the research instrument used were validated. A total of one hundred and thirty-five respondents were used for the study. From the formulated testing based on z-test, three hypotheses were investigated termed as HO1, HO2 and HO3. HO1 test hypothesis of pipeline failure as a result of leakages along it and if the leakage detection is because there is no DSC, CAO-SCADA management tool along the pipeline. The result obtained showed that z-calculated is less than the critical value of 1.96 with a significant level of 0.05. From the results obtained, the hypothesis HO1 is accepted, thus failure of this pipeline is because the DSO, CAO-SCADA is not present in the system. HO2 testing determined if there exists any difference significantly between the DSC and CAO-SCADA system. From the result, the z-calculated which is 0.0065 is less than the critical value which is 1. This implies that the null hypothesis (HO2) is accepted. Meaning that there is no significant difference between CAO-SCADA and the DCO for the effective management and monitoring and safety operations in the pipeline. The last hypothesis is to test if there exists significant difference between DCS and CAO-SCADA system for effective industrial system control of leakages in pipeline. Out of the 135(100%) respondents, 106(78.52%) agreed with the recommendations made by the researchers while 12.59% partially agreed. 4(5.18%) have a clear understanding and 5(0.0370%) are indifferent about the recommendations made.