See no evil?
See no evil?
复制标题
没看到邪恶吗？
DOI：
10.1145/2160673.2160680
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Dearden A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dearden A
本文考虑了在进行干预主义ICTD研究中出现的一些伦理问题，并检查了研究人员随时可以获得的伦理建议和指导。近年来，技术研究人员越来越有兴趣运用他们的技能来解决发展中地区人民的需求和愿望。信息和通信技术促进发展（ICTD）先前的许多研究试图研究和理解围绕技术的过程，与此相反，技术研究人员感兴趣的是寻找改变这些技术形式的方法，以促进理想的社会目标。这些更具干预性的研究遭遇引发了独特的伦理挑战。本文探讨了贸发会议主要期刊和会议以及主要发展研究期刊上的讨论，并审查了相关研究领域的行为守则。对这些文献的探索表明，直接解决干预主义ICTD挑战的建议的数量、质量和细节实际上非常有限。本文认为，ICTD研究界迫切需要对这一问题进行调查和讨论。
This paper considers some of the ethical questions that arise in conducting interventionist ICTD research, and examines the ethical advice and guidance that is readily available to researchers.Recent years have seen a growing interest from technology researchers in applying their skills to address the needs and aspirations of people in developing regions. In contrast to much previous research in Information and Communication Technologies for Development (ICTD) which has sought to study and understand processes surrounding technologies, technology researchers are interested in finding ways to change the forms of these technologies in order to promote desirable social aims. These more interventionist research encounters raise distinctive ethical challenges.This paper explores the discussions that have been presented in the major ICTD journals and conferences and major development studies journals as well as examining codes of conduct from related fields of research. Exploration of this literature shows that the quantity, quality and detail of advice that directly addresses the challenges of interventionist ICTD is actually very limited. This paper argues that the there is an urgent need for the ICTD research community to investigate and debate this subject.