Law and Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State CASS R.SUNSTEIN AND ADRIANVERMEULECambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2020, 188 pp., £20.95

Law and Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State CASS R.SUNSTEIN AND ADRIANVERMEULECambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2020, 188 pp., £20.95
复制标题

法律与利维坦:救赎行政国家 CASS R.SUNSTEIN 和 ADRIANVERMEULE 马萨诸塞州剑桥:哈佛大学出版社贝尔纳普出版社,2020 年,188 页,20.95 英镑

DOI:
10.1111/jols.12293
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
1.3
通讯作者:
MEAKIN J
MEAKIN J
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
MEAKIN J

文献摘要

相似文献

行政国家继续煽动热烈的学术和司法意见。长期以来的争论集中在非选举产生的政府官僚机构所享有和行使的行政权力,最常见的例子是行政机构的行政、立法和司法权限。现代行政国家的政府结构远远超出了一个简单的概念,即三个独立的政府部门:行政、立法和司法。这明显违反了每个部门的预期角色和权限,这加剧了人们对行政国家的担忧,尤其是在美国。虽然“大政府”的角色和现代治理实践的性质是一个全球关注的问题,但关于行政国家与美国宪法之间一致性的辩论尤其成熟和根深蒂固。
The administrative state continues to incite ardent academic and judicial opinion. A long-standing debate centres around the executive powers enjoyed and exercised by unelected government bureaucracies, most commonly exemplified by the executive, legislative, and judicial competences of administrative agencies. The structure of government in the modern administrative state extends far beyond a simple conception of three separate branches of government: executive, legislature, and judiciary. It is the apparent violations of the intended roles and competences of each branch that fuel concerns about the administrative state, especially in the United States (US). While the role of'big government'and the nature of modern governing practices is a global concern, debate about the (in) congruence between the administrative state and the US Constitution is particularly mature and entrenched.