Attention and complacency
Attention and complacency
复制标题
关注和自满
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Inagaki
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Moray;T. Inagaki
自满的问题进行了分析，它表明，以前的研究，声称要显示其存在是有缺陷的，因为自满的存在不能被证明，除非指定为基准的最佳行为。使用gedanken实验，它进一步表明，在一般情况下，即使是最佳的监测可以检测到所有的信号。自满与注意力（监控、采样）有关，而与检测无关，而且几乎没有证据表明自满行为。声称行为是自满的，就是指责操作员没有检测到信号。这是不可取的，因为所谓的自满行为可能是糟糕的系统设计的错。
The problem of complacency is analysed, and it is shown that previous research that claims to show its existence is defective, because the existence of complacency can not be proved unless optimal behaviour is specified as a benchmark. Using gedanken experiments, it is further shown that, in general, not even with optimal monitoring can all signals be detected. Complacency is concerned with attention (monitoring, sampling), not with detection, and there is little evidence for complacent behaviour. To claim that behaviour is complacent is to blame the operator for failure to detect signals. This is undesirable, since so-called complacent behaviour may rather be the fault of poor systems design.