COMPARING TWO VERSIONS OF THE REALS

COMPARING TWO VERSIONS OF THE REALS
复制标题

比较两个版本的实数

DOI:
10.1017/jsl.2015.77
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
The Journal of Symbolic Logic
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Knight
J. Knight
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gregory Igusa;J. Knight

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要 Schweber [10] 定义了一种可归约性,使我们能够比较任意基数结构的计算能力。这里我们关注实数的有序域 ${\cal R}$ 和仅编码 ω 子集的结构 ${\cal W}$。在[10]中,观察到 ${\cal W}$ 可简化为 ${\cal R}$ 。我们证明 ${\cal R}$ 不能简化为 ${\cal W}$ 。作为证明的一部分,我们证明,对于具有剩余域 k 的可数递归饱和实闭域 ${\cal P}$,${\cal P}$ 的某些副本不会计算 k 的副本。
Abstract Schweber [10] defined a reducibility that allows us to compare the computing power of structures of arbitrary cardinality. Here we focus on the ordered field ${\cal R}$ of real numbers and a structure ${\cal W}$ that just codes the subsets of ω. In [10], it was observed that ${\cal W}$ is reducible to ${\cal R}$ . We prove that ${\cal R}$ is not reducible to ${\cal W}$ . As part of the proof, we show that for a countable recursively saturated real closed field ${\cal P}$ with residue field k, some copy of ${\cal P}$ does not compute a copy of k.