Efficacy and Safety of Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Gemcitabine
Efficacy and Safety of Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Gemcitabine
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/mpa.0b013e3181706d93
复制
发表时间:
2008-11-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Omata, Masao
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nakai, Yousuke;Isayama, Hiroyuki;Omata, Masao
Objectives: Expandable metallic stents (EMSs) are widely used to palliate unresectable malignant biliary obstructions. The efficacy and safety of EMS in patients receiving gemcitabine (GEM) for unresectable pancreatic cancer is evaluated.Methods: Data for 147 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied retrospectively: 52 received GEM without EMS, 36 received GEM with EMS, 27 received only best supportive care (BSC) without EMS, and 32 received BSC with EMS.Results: Expandable metallic stent did not increase adverse effects (>grade 2) caused by GEM (P = 0.809), and the rates of infections other than cholangitis and cholecystitis were neither increased by GEM nor by EMS (P = 0.287). Cholangitis and cholecystitis occurred exclusively in patients with EMS and was managed successfully. Tumor extension, good performance status, and GEM, but not EMS, were shown to affect survival. Stent-related complications were observed in 26 patients (72%) receiving GEM and in 17 patients (53%) with BSC (P = 0.133). Multivariate analyses revealed no predictors for stent-related complications, although the use of covered EMS and good performance status were associated with longer stent patency. Gemcitabine affected neither stent-related complications nor stent patency.Conclusions: Expandable metallic stent placement is safe and effective in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer receiving GEM. Gemcitabine improves survival irrespective of EMS placement.