The spatial integration and coordinated industrial development of urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

The spatial integration and coordinated industrial development of urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
复制标题

长江经济带城市群空间整合与产业协调发展

DOI:
10.1016/j.cities.2020.102801
复制
发表时间:
2020-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
Tang, Mingyang
Tang, Mingyang
中科院分区:
经济学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu, Yaolin;Zhang, Xianghui;Tang, Mingyang

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

城市聚集是国家发展和区域繁荣的引擎。尽管广泛的工作调查了与这种新的空间治理形式有关的问题,但很少有研究直接说明了城市聚集的空间整合及其与工业发展的关系。本文采用夜间光数据和工业企业数据集,以调查1995 - 2015年中国长江经济带(YREB)的空间整合和工业发展。我们在这里说明了城市聚集的空间整合与工业发展的特征之间的显着关系。在空间整合的过程中,城市形式,互化关系及其进化显示出明显的区域差异。由于社会经济和地理特征的差异,城市系统在发达领域更加先进和密切相关。工业专业化(多元化)和城市形式之间存在显着的负(积极)空间相关性,通过使用双变量Moran的I,空间聚类模式在三个城市集聚中显然有所不同。面板回归表明,互化关系与工业发展的特征显着相关。工业多元化和竞争的较高水平与较弱的互化关系有关,而工业结构相似之处则相反。这些发现可用于制定合理的政策和计划,并支持未来的区域空间整合和协调的发展。
Urban agglomeration is the engine of national development and regional prosperity. Although extensive work has investigated issues related to this new form of spatial governance, few studies have directly illustrated the spatial integration of urban agglomeration and its relationship with industrial development. This paper employs nighttime light data and industrial enterprise datasets to investigate the spatial integration and industrial development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) of China for 1995-2015. We here illustrate the significant relationship between the spatial integration of urban agglomerations and the characteristics of industrial development. In the process of spatial integration, urban form, intercity relation and their evolution show clear regional differences. Because of the differences in socio-economic and geographical characteristics, urban systems are more advanced and closely related in developed areas. A significant negative (positive) spatial correlation between industrial specialization (diversification) and urban form is supported by using bivariate Moran's I, and spatial clustering patterns are clearly different across the three urban agglomerations. A panel regression reveals that intercity relations are significantly associated with the characteristics of industrial development. Higher levels of industrial diversification and competition are associated with weaker intercity relations, while industrial structures similarities are reversed. These findings could be used to formulate reasonable policies and plans and to support future regional spatial integration and coordinated development.