A Comparison between Cigarette Topography from a One-Week Natural Environment Study to FTC/ISO, Health Canada, and Massachusetts Department of Public Health Puff Profile Standards

A Comparison between Cigarette Topography from a One-Week Natural Environment Study to FTC/ISO, Health Canada, and Massachusetts Department of Public Health Puff Profile Standards
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/ijerph17103444
复制
发表时间:
2020-05-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hensel, Edward C.
Hensel, Edward C.
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Robinson, Risa J.;Sarles, S. Emma;Hensel, Edward C.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

用于检测卷烟排放的标准化地形方案包括联邦贸易委员会/国际标准组织(FTC/ISO)、马萨诸塞州卫生部(MDPH)和加拿大卫生部(HC)。缺乏关于这些协议如何很好地代表实际使用行为的数据。本研究旨在比较各种香烟品牌在自然环境中测量的抽吸协议标准和实际使用地形。年龄在18至65岁之间的吸烟者被招募。每位参与者都配备了wPUM (TM)卷烟地形监测仪,并指示他们在自然环境中随意使用他们常用品牌的卷烟监测仪一周。对监测器进行重复性测试,并用TAP (TM)地形分析程序检查数据质量并进行分析。分析了n = 26名参与者的数据。抽气流量范围为17.2 ~ 110.6 mL/s,平均(STD)为40.4 (21.7)mL/s;持续时间为0.7 ~ 3.1 s,平均(STD)为1.5±0.5 s;烟量为21.4 ~ 159.2 mL,平均(STD)为54.9 (29.8)mL。目前的地形标准不足以代表广泛的真实吸烟行为。这些数据表明,需要更新标准,以便排放测试能够提供有意义的风险评估。
Standardized topography protocols for testing cigarette emissions include the Federal Trade Commission/International Standard Organization (FTC/ISO), the Massachusetts Department of Health (MDPH), and Health Canada (HC). Data are lacking for how well these protocols represent actual use behavior. This study aims to compare puff protocol standards to actual use topography measured in natural environments across a range of cigarette brands. Current smokers between 18 and 65 years of age were recruited. Each participant was provided with a wPUM (TM) cigarette topography monitor and instructed to use the monitor with their usual brand cigarette ad libitum in their natural environment for one week. Monitors were tested for repeatability, and data were checked for quality and analyzed with the TAP (TM) topography analysis program. Data from n = 26 participants were analyzed. Puff flow rates ranged from 17.2 to 110.6 mL/s, with a mean (STD) of 40.4 (21.7) mL/s; durations from 0.7 to 3.1 s, with a mean (STD) of 1.5 +/- 0.5 s; and volumes from 21.4 to 159.2 mL, with a mean (STD) of 54.9 (29.8) mL. Current topography standards were found to be insufficient to represent smoking across the wide range of real behaviors. These data suggest updated standards are needed such that emissions tests will provide meaningful risk assessments.