Development of an interprofessional competency framework for collaborative practice in Japan
Development of an interprofessional competency framework for collaborative practice in Japan
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/13561820.2018.1426559
复制
发表时间：
2018-01-01
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Otsuka, Mariko
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Haruta, Junji;Yoshida, Kazue;Otsuka, Mariko
人口的快速老龄化需要改善医疗保健专业人员之间的合作。遗憾的是，跨专业合作在日本尚未得到有效实施。因此，我们的目标是为日本医疗保健专业人员开发跨专业能力框架。该项目分为四个步骤，首先是对潜在能力领域进行初步分类，然后是指导原则和原型开发，对原型的反馈，最后达成共识。首先，作者（JH和MO）在日本跨专业教育协会（JAIPE）的两次学术会议上收集了关于跨专业合作能力的意见，然后按主题分析了数据。其次，由JAIPE和大学代表组成的项目团队提取了域和语句作为原型1。第三，来自专业组织的七名代表加入了项目小组，开发了原型2。然后，我们在公开研讨会上并通过公众评论呼吁对修订后的原型2提供反馈。在对原型2进行修订后，一个包括20名大学、专业组织和保健从业人员代表的新项目小组最终讨论了原型3，制定了最终草案并达成了共识。在收集数据后的分析中，我们提取了11个主题。我们开发了四个关键原则，适用于六个领域作为原型1-3。最后，我们的能力框架包括两个核心领域的病人/客户端/家庭/社区为中心和跨专业的沟通，和四个外围领域的角色贡献，促进关系，反思和理解他人。我们在日本开发了一个跨专业能力框架，包括两个核心和四个外围领域。跨专业能力框架可能会影响日本医疗保健中的高背景和关系主义的理解。我们希望我们的跨专业能力框架将鼓励在日本系统地实施跨专业教育和合作。
Rapid aging of the population necessitates improved collaboration among healthcare professionals. Unfortunately, interprofessional collaboration has yet to be implemented effectively in Japan. Therefore, we aimed to develop an interprofessional competency framework for Japanese healthcare professionals. The project was conducted as a four-step process, starting with initial categorization of potential competency domains,, followed by guiding principle and prototype development, feedback on the prototype, and final consensus. First, authors (JH and MO) collected opinions about competency in interprofessional collaboration at two academic meetings of the Japan Association for Interprofessional Education (JAIPE) and then analyzed the data thematically. Second, a project team consisting of JAIPE and University representatives extracted the domains and statements as prototype 1. Third, seven representatives from professional organizations joined the project team and developed prototype 2. We then called for feedback on the revised prototype 2 at both an open symposium and via public comments. Following revision of prototype 2, a new project team including 20 university, professional organization and health practitioner representatives finally discussed prototype 3, developed the final draft and reached a consensus. In analysis after collecting the data, we extracted 11 themes. We developed four key principles which applied to six domains as prototype 1-3. Finally, our competency framework included two core domains of Patient-/client-/family-/community-centered and Interprofessional communication, and four peripheral domains of Role contribution, Facilitation of relationships, Reflection and Understanding of others. We developed an interprofessional competency framework in Japan which consists of two core and four peripheral domains. The interprofessional competency framework is likely to affect the understanding of high-context and relationalism in Japanese healthcare. We hope that our interprofessional competency framework will encourage the systematic implementation of interprofessional education and collaboration in Japan.