Perceptions and Aspirations Toward Peer Mentoring in Social Media-Based Electronic Cigarette Cessation Interventions for Adolescents and Young Adults: Focus Group Study.
Perceptions and Aspirations Toward Peer Mentoring in Social Media-Based Electronic Cigarette Cessation Interventions for Adolescents and Young Adults: Focus Group Study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.2196/42538
复制
发表时间：
2022-12-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Ling PM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lyu JC;Afolabi A;White JS;Ling PM
社交媒体为青少年和年轻人（AYAs）提供了一个很有前途的电子烟戒烟干预渠道;然而，在社交媒体上提供的干预措施面临着参与者保留率低和参与度随着时间的推移而下降的挑战。同侪指导有可能缓解这些挑战。本研究的目的是了解，从学员和潜在的导师的角度来看，需要，期望和关注的AYAs关于同伴指导，告知基于社交媒体的同伴指导干预AYAs之间的电子烟戒烟的发展。七个焦点小组，包括四个学员小组和三个潜在的导师小组，与26名有过电子烟使用经验的AYA一起进行，并试图在基于社交媒体的电子烟戒烟干预的背景下戒烟。讨论的重点是同伴导师的首选特征，对同伴指导的期望，指导模式，导师培训，同伴导师的激励措施，首选的社会媒体平台进行干预，监督和关注。焦点小组的成绩单进行编码和分析，使用主题分析方法。总体而言，参与者接受基于社交媒体的戒烟干预中的同伴指导，并认为他们可能有助于帮助电子烟戒烟。参与者认为，同龄人导师最重要的特征是年龄相仿，并且不使用电子烟。参与者希望同侪导师能够分享个人经历、提供情感支持并发送签到和提醒。同侪导师支持一群学员，并根据需要进行一对一辅导，是首选的辅导模式。大多数参与者认为，10名学员组成的小组，导师与学员的比例为1：3-5，是可以接受的。与会者表示，导师培训应包括情商，沟通技巧和有关电子烟的科学证据。虽然金钱奖励不是成为同侪导师的主要激励因素，但被视为补偿导师时间的好方法。由于其功能，Instagram被认为是提供同行指导干预措施的适当社交媒体平台。参与者对基于社交媒体的同伴指导没有表达太多的隐私问题，但提到应该设定界限和社区协议，以保持关系的专业性。这项研究反映了年轻人对同伴指导干预的需求和偏好，以补充支持电子烟戒烟的社交媒体计划。下一步将是建立这样一个同伴指导计划的可行性，可接受性和初步的有效性。
Social media offer a promising channel to deliver e-cigarette cessation interventions to adolescents and young adults (AYAs); however, interventions delivered on social media face challenges of low participant retention and decreased engagement over time. Peer mentoring has the potential to ameliorate these challenges. The aim of this study was to understand, from both the mentee and potential mentor perspective, the needs, expectations, and concerns of AYAs regarding peer mentoring to inform the development of social media–based peer mentoring interventions for e-cigarette cessation among AYAs. Seven focus groups, including four mentee groups and three potential mentor groups, were conducted with 26 AYAs who had prior experience with e-cigarette use and attempts to quit in the context of a social media–based e-cigarette cessation intervention. Discussion focused on preferred characteristics of peer mentors, expectations about peer mentoring, mentoring mode, mentor training, incentives for peer mentors, preferred social media platforms for intervention delivery, supervision, and concerns. Focus group transcripts were coded and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Overall, participants were receptive to peer mentoring in social media–based cessation interventions and believed they could be helpful in assisting e-cigarette cessation. Participants identified the most important characteristics of peer mentors to be of similar age and to be abstinent from e-cigarette use. Participants expected peer mentors would share personal experiences, provide emotional support, and send check-ins and reminders. Peer mentors supporting a group of mentees in combination with one-on-one mentoring as needed was the preferred mentoring mode. A group of 10 mentees with a mentor:mentee ratio of 1:3-5 was deemed acceptable for most participants. Participants expressed that mentor training should include emotional intelligence, communication skills, and the scientific evidence about e-cigarettes. Although monetary incentives were not the main motivating factor for being a peer mentor, they were viewed as a good way to compensate mentors’ time. Instagram was considered an appropriate social media platform to deliver a peer-mentored intervention due to its functionality. Participants did not express many privacy concerns about social media–based peer mentoring, but mentioned that boundaries and community agreements should be set to keep relationships professional. This study reflects the needs and preferences of young people for a peer mentoring intervention to complement a social media program to support e-cigarette cessation. The next step will be to establish the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of such a peer mentoring program.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
13.8
作者：
Gaiha SM;Lempert LK;Halpern-Felsher B
通讯作者：
Halpern-Felsher B
影响因子：
33.9
作者：
Gentzke, Andrea S.;Creamer, MeLisa;King, Brian A.
通讯作者：
King, Brian A.
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Kreslake, Jennifer M.;Simard, Bethany J.;Hair, Elizabeth C.
通讯作者：
Hair, Elizabeth C.
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph10115507
发表时间：
2013-10-28
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ford P;Clifford A;Gussy K;Gartner C
通讯作者：
Gartner C
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Maher CA;Lewis LK;Ferrar K;Marshall S;De Bourdeaudhuij I;Vandelanotte C
通讯作者：
Vandelanotte C