Resettling, disconnecting or dis-placing? Attending to local sociality, culture and history in disaster settings
Resettling, disconnecting or dis-placing? Attending to local sociality, culture and history in disaster settings
复制标题
重新安置、断开连接还是流离失所？
DOI：
10.1111/apv.12230
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Richard Howitt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Minna Hsu;Tetsuya Okada;Suguru Mori;Richard Howitt
在许多灾害情况下，自上而下的应对措施强调“专家主导”的解决方案，通常涉及搬迁受灾社区。虽然目的可能是将人们从危险的道路上转移出来，促进恢复，但如果不注意当地灾前的情况，以及受影响社区内部和周围的权力、复原力和脆弱性之间的相互作用，往往会将重新安置视为流离失所或脱节。这种疏忽甚至可能导致边缘化群体（特别是在殖民地环境中）进入一个被剥夺财产和处于不利地位的新阶段。本文探讨了澳大利亚、日本和台湾的经验，以反思在制定“更好”的灾害应对措施时需要注意的地方社会性、地方文化和地方复原力问题。
In many disaster settings, top‐down responses emphasise ‘expert‐led’ solutions that often involve relocating disaster‐affected communities. While the intention might be to move people from harm's way and facilitate recovery, failure to attend to local pre‐disaster circumstances as well as the interplay between power, resilience and vulnerability within and around affected communities often sees resettlement reconfigure as displacement or disconnection. This oversight may even usher in a new phase of dispossession and disadvantage for marginalised groups (particularly in colonial settings). This paper explores experiences in Australia, Japan and Taiwan to reflect on what issues of local sociality, local culture and local resilience need to be attended to in framing ‘better’ disaster responses.