Participatory Action Research and Its Meanings: Vivencia, Praxis, Conscientization
Participatory Action Research and Its Meanings: Vivencia, Praxis, Conscientization
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0741713614523667
复制
发表时间：
2014-08-01
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Erdem, Gizem
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Glassman, Michael;Erdem, Gizem
本文追溯了参与性行动研究(PAR)的“第二种”，也可以说是更广为人知的“类型”的发展。文章认为，PAR的起源是高度分散的，不能真正追溯到一个人或甚至一个研究小组的想法。相反，PAR的发展与20世纪的社会运动联系在一起，特别是土地改革、反殖民主义，以及对新研究方法的需求，这些运动同时发生在多个大陆上。PAR的起源与在美国发展起来的行动研究没有什么关系。因此，PAR所指有时会令人困惑，甚至具有误导性。我们建议，第二个PAR也可以通过其镜像概念Vivencia、Prxis和RECELIZATION-PAR/VPC得到承认。我们讨论了PAR/VPC的核心基础及其演变与发展中社会的社会政治背景及其争取解放的斗争的密切联系。我们还建议我们对PAR/VPC的未来进行思考，纳入女权主义观点，并将青年纳入教育运动。
This article traces the development of the "second" and arguably more well-known "genre" of participatory action research (PAR). The article argues that the origins of PAR are highly distributed and cannot really be traced back to the ideas of a single person or even a single group of researchers. Instead, the development of PAR is tied to social movements of the 20th century, in particular land reform, anticolonialism, and need for a new research methodology, occurring simultaneously across multiple continents. The origins of PAR have little to do with the action research that developed in the United States. For that reason the PAR referent can sometimes be confusing or even misleading. We suggest that the second PAR also be recognized through its mirror concepts of vivencia, praxis, and conscientization-PAR/VPC. We discuss the core underpinnings of PAR/VPC and its evolution with strong ties to the sociopolitical context of developing societies and their fight for liberation. We also suggest our reflections of future of PAR/VPC with integration of feminist perspectives and inclusion of youth in the education movement.