THE MEASUREMENT OF COMPUTER ATTITUDES - AN EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE SCALES
THE MEASUREMENT OF COMPUTER ATTITUDES - AN EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE SCALES
复制标题
DOI：
10.2190/dxlm-5j80-fnkh-pp2l
复制
发表时间：
1993-01-01
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
DUKES, RL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
GARDNER, DG;DISCENZA, R;DUKES, RL
这项研究根据经验比较了四种可用的计算机态度测量方法，包括计算机焦虑。该研究的一个目的是确定哪些措施（如果有的话）在可靠性和有效性的心理测量标准上优于其他措施。该研究的第二个目标是从计算机态度的四种测量中确定较少数量的项目，这些项目需要较少的时间才能完成，但会产生高度可靠的计算机态度量表。结果表明，所有测试的措施在信度和效度方面基本相同。尝试凭经验得出改进的量表是没有成效的。其中两项措施在许多其他标准上均优于其他标准。预期用途应该是选择的主要标准，因为四种措施中的任何一种都可能提供可靠、合理有效的信息。
This study empirically compared four available measures of attitudes towards computers, including computer anxiety. One objective of the study was to determine which, if any, of the measures was superior to the others on the psychometric criteria of reliability and validity. A secondary objective of the study was to identify a smaller number of items from the four measures of computer attitudes that would take less time to complete, yet result in highly reliable scales of computer attitudes. Results showed that all measures tested were essentially equal in terms of reliability and validity. Attempts to empirically derive improved scales were unproductive. Two of the measures were superior on a number of other criteria. Intended use should be the main criterion for choice as any of the four measures will likely provide reliable, reasonably valid information.