Clinical T staging is superior to fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for predicting local outcomes after intra-arterial infusion chemoradiotherapy for maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma

Clinical T staging is superior to fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for predicting local outcomes after intra-arterial infusion chemoradiotherapy for maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma
复制标题

DOI:
10.18999/nagjms.80.4.541
复制
发表时间:
2018-11-01
影响因子:
0.9
通讯作者:
Yamakado, Koichiro
Yamakado, Koichiro
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Doi, Hiroshi;Fujiwara, Masayuki;Yamakado, Koichiro

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

动脉灌注同步放化疗(IA-CRT)已被用于治疗局部晚期上颌窦鳞状细胞癌(MSSCC),取得了积极的结果。然而,一个最佳的预测预后因素MSSCC治疗IA-CRT仍然难以捉摸。本研究的目的是评估18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)的可行性,包括体积参数,以预测MSSCC与IA-CRT治疗的预后。在这项回顾性研究中,分析了24例新诊断的MSSCC患者在IA-CRT治疗前接受FDG-PET成像。所有患者均接受放疗,肿瘤总剂量为60-66戈伊,采用常规分割方案,采用三维适形放射治疗或调强放射治疗。放疗同时进行,同时动脉灌注化疗(顺铂)。IA-CRT有效率为83.33%。1、3年生存率分别为81.30%和64.34%。1年和3年局部无失败率分别为57.21%和40.96%。局部失败与不良生存率显著相关(P = 0.0152)。此外,临床T分期对临床T3或更低、T4 a和T4 b患者的局部控制结局进行了明显分层(P = 0.0312)。此外,T4 b期患者的局部控制显著差于T3或更低(P = 0.0103)。然而. FDG-PET参数未提供有关治疗结局的显著预测信息。总之,治疗前T分期预测IA-CRT的局部控制,这与生存相关。
Concomitant intra-arterial infusion chemoradiotherapy (IA-CRT) has been used to treat locally advanced maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MSSCC) with positive outcomes. However, an optimal predictive prognostic factor for MSSCC treated with IA-CRT remains elusive. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), including volumetric parameters, to predict the prognosis of MSSCC treated with IA-CRT. Twenty-four patients with newly diagnosed MSSCC receiving FDG-PET imaging before IA-CRT treatment were analyzed in this retrospective study. All patients underwent radiotherapy with a total tumor dose of 60-66 Gy in a conventional fractionation schedule, using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Radiotherapy was performed concurrently with concurrent intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy (cisplatin). The IA-CRT response rate was 83.33%. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 81.30% and 64.34%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year local failure-free rates were 57.21% and 40.96%, respectively. Local failure was significantly associated with poor survival (P = 0.0152). Further, clinical T staging dearly stratified local control outcomes among patients with clinical T3 or less, T4a, and T4b (P = 0.0312). Moreover, patients with stage T4b showed a significantly poorer local control compared with T3 or less (P = 0.0103). However. FDG-PET parameters provided no significant predictive information regarding treatment outcome. To conclude, pretreatment T stage predicts local control by IA-CRT, which is associated with survival.