Attachment security: A meta-analysis of maternal mental health correlates
Attachment security: A meta-analysis of maternal mental health correlates
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00023-9
复制
发表时间：
2000-11-01
影响因子：
12.8
通讯作者：
Guger, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Atkinson, L;Paglia, A;Guger, S
这项荟萃分析探讨了依恋安全性与三种母体金属健康相关因素之间的关系。该荟萃分析基于35项研究，39个样本和2，064对母子。社会婚姻支持（r = 0.14;基于16项研究，涉及17个样本和902对配对），压力（r = 0.19; 13项研究，14个样本和768对配对）和抑郁（r = 0.18; 15项研究，19个样本和953对配对）都被证明与依恋安全性显著相关。所有结构均显示出显著的效应量差异。生态因素和方法来衡量支持可以解释异质性的影响大小的社会婚姻支持文献。应力的效应量根据应力评估和附件安全性评估之间的时间而变化。在抑郁症的研究中，临床样本比社区样本产生了更大的效应量。我们讨论这些结果的测量问题（特别是，过度依赖自我报告的库存），并在需要研究的相关因素的变化，在附件安全，而不仅仅是附件安全本身的相关因素。(C)2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
This meta-analysis addresses the association between attachment security and each of three maternal metal health correlates. The meta-analysis is based on 35 studies, 39 samples, and 2,064 mother-child pairs. Social-marital support (r = .14; based on 16 studies involving 17 samples and 902 dyads), stress (r = .19; 13 studies, 14 samples, and 768 dyads), and depression (r = .18; 15 studies, 19 samples, and 953 dyads) each proved significantly related to attachment security. All constructs showed substantial variance in effect size. Ecological factors and approach to measuring support may explain the heterogeneity of effect sizes within the social-marital support literature. Effect sizes for stress varied according to the time between assessment of stress and assessment of attachment security. Among studies of depression, clinical samples yielded significantly larger effect sizes than community samples. We discuss these results in terms of measurement issues (specifically, overreliance on self-report inventories) and in terms of the need to study the correlates of change in attachment security, rather than just the correlates of attachment security perse. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.