Body modification
Body modification
复制标题
车身改装
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Asbed Aryan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Asbed Aryan
Silvia Reisfeld介绍了一项关于青少年对自己皮肤的纹身，穿孔，划痕和其他攻击行为的意义的研究。她研究了个人和文化两个方面以及这两个因素之间的相互关系。希尔达角卡茨的论文集中在身体修饰和疤痕，特别是与我们文化中父母铭文的特殊特征有关，这些铭文是由不同世代的铭文造成的。最后，Javier García提交了一篇论文，强调身体是这些修饰、装饰和仪式的对象。他提请注意这样一个事实，即我们既要处理受不同历史时期意识形态影响的历史维度，也要处理在不同写作形式中看到的性感维度，这些写作形式将性感和文化的不同方面结合在一起。他接着详细介绍了纹身和穿孔日益流行的情况，更令人震惊的是，通过加热和划痕或切割皮肤形成的疤痕来改变身体，这种现象正在蔓延，特别是在青少年和其他城市群体中。Reisfeld声称纹身有一个精心设计的意向性进行了讨论。一些参与者一致认为，纹身绘画就像一个有待破译的文本，代表了自我和物体的各个方面，特别是作为一种表现对丢失物体的哀悼的元素。（各种临床小插曲都提到了父亲的死亡。其他参与者不太重视这个想法，更多地提到身体改造的实际行为：皮肤的改变以及由此引起的痛苦和疼痛，这被视为其他侵犯皮肤行为的共同要素，例如划痕，烙印，以及从特定身体部位悬挂重物，引起拉伸。有人认为，根据上述情况，精神分析的意义可能有更黑暗、更个人主义的一面。另一位与会者回忆了弗洛伊德（1919），并建议再次提出以下问题：“哪个孩子被打，谁在打孩子？”这就意味着，不仅要考虑受虐狂的一面，即寻求痛苦的方式来影响自己，而且要同时考虑虐待狂的因素以及受害者认同的人。当考虑到防御结构和创造“第二层皮肤”（Bick，1968）时，人们普遍同意，作为在心理水平上缺乏母性遏制功能的替代品。国际精神分析杂志2006;87：849-51
Silvia Reisfeld presented a study into the meaning of tattoos, piercing, scarifi cation and other acts of aggression in adolescents against their own skin. She examined both individual and cultural dimensions and the interrelationship between these two factors. Hilda C. Catz’s paper focused on body modifi cations and scars specifi cally related to the special features of parental inscriptions in our culture which resulted from inscriptions across different generations. Lastly, Javier García presented a paper which emphasized the body as the object of these modifi cations, adornments and rituals. He drew attention to the fact that we were dealing with both an historic dimension infl uenced by ideologies from different periods of history, and also with an erogenous dimension seen in different forms of writing, which bring together different aspects of erogeneity and culture. He went on to detail the increasing popularity of tattooing and piercing, and, what is more alarming, body modifi cation by means of branding with heat and scarifi cation, or scars formed by cutting into the skin, a phenomenon which is gaining ground, in particular with adolescents and other urban groups. Reisfeld’s claim that tattooing has an elaborate intentionality was discussed. Some of the participants agreed that tattoo drawing is like a text to be deciphered and represents aspects of the ego and of the object, especially as an element that shows the mourning for a lost object. (Various clinical vignettes referred to the death of the father.) Other participants placed less importance on this idea and referred more to the actual act of body modifi cation: the alteration of the skin and the suffering and pain caused by this, which were seen as elements common to other acts of aggression against the skin, such as scarifi cation, branding, and the hanging of weights from a specifi c body part, causing stretching. It was suggested that, in the light of the above, the psychoanalytic meaning may have a darker, more individualistic side to it. Another participant recalled Freud (1919) and suggested that the following question be asked again: ‘Which child is being beaten and who is beating the child?’ This would mean considering not only the masochistic aspect of seeking out ways for pain to be infl icted on oneself but also, at the same time, considering the sadistic element and with whom the sufferer is identifying. There was general agreement when considering the defensive structure and the creation of a ‘second skin’ (Bick, 1968), as a replacement for what is lacking in the function of maternal containment at a mental level. Int J Psychoanal 2006;87:849–51