A COMPARISON OF TRAPPING METHODS FOR ADULT MOSQUITOES - SPECIES RESPONSE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCE
A COMPARISON OF TRAPPING METHODS FOR ADULT MOSQUITOES - SPECIES RESPONSE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/jmedent/4.2.200
复制
发表时间：
1967-01-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
BIDLINGM.WL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BIDLINGM.WL
采用汽车诱捕法和吸力诱捕法等非引诱剂方法建立种群水平，并与声饵、光饵和人饵引诱法进行比较。采用吸声诱捕法捕获了较多的四爪按蚊和低尾乌氏按蚊。吸力捕集器在满月时的飞行活动水平高于新月时，而光捕集器在满月时的飞行活动水平较低。在森林中设置陷阱，减少满月的影响。在所有的月相中，森林中的捕光器比露天的捕光器捕获的数量要多。相对于开阔地区，更喜欢树木栖息地的物种也是最不受光诱吸引的物种。无论光源是天然的还是人造的，避开或减少在光照强度较高的地区活动都会减少林地蚊子的捕获量。
Non-attractant methods, truck trap and suction trap, were used to establish population levels for comparison with techniques employing sound, light and human bait as attractants. Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say and Uranotaenia lowii Theobald were taken in greater numbers in suction traps employing sound. Suction traps revealed a higher level of flight activity at full moon than at new moon whereas light trap collections were smaller at full moon. Influence of full moon was reduced for traps located in a forest. Light traps in a forest took larger numbers than light traps in the open at all moon phases. Species which prefer wooded habitats to open areas were also those species least attracted to light traps. Avoidance of, or reduced activity in, areas of higher light intensities resulted in smaller catches of woodland mosquitoes whether the light source was natural or artificial.