Historicism and Industry Emergence: Industry Knowledge from Pre-Emergence to Stylized Fact
Historicism and Industry Emergence: Industry Knowledge from Pre-Emergence to Stylized Fact
复制标题
历史决定论与行业兴起：从出现前到程式化事实的行业知识
DOI：
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646890.003.0009
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Daniel Wadhwani
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Kirsch;Mahka Moeen;R. Daniel Wadhwani
近年来，组织学者对解释产业的出现和演变的兴趣导致了对历史背景和来源的越来越多的参与（Ventresca和Mohr，2002年）。在宏观组织研究的许多理论流派中，包括新制度主义（Hargadon和道格拉斯，2001年; Leblebici等人，1991），组织生态学（Hannan和Freeman，1987），进化经济学（Gort和Klepper，1982;纳尔逊和Winter，1982），以及社会认知观点（亨德森和Clark，1990; Tripsas和Gavetti，2000）。事实上，这一研究往往包括努力利用历史证据，不仅从最近几十年来，而且从更遥远的过去（Haveman和Rao，1997），并检查行业在很长一段时间（Tripsas，1997）。越来越多地使用数据和来源，从过去提出了更广泛的问题，历史研究和推理究竟是如何在研究行业的价值。主流组织研究对这一问题的主要回应可能被描述为一个专注于识别“历史机制”的观点，这种观点将历史视为一种背景，用于研究时间和组织事件的顺序如何塑造市场演变的理论相关问题。这项研究利用历史证据来研究印记（Marquis，2003），进化变化（Murmann，2006; Aldrich和Ruef，2006）和路径依赖
In recent years, organization scholars’ interest in accounting for the emergence and evolution of industries has led to a growing engagement with historical settings and sources (Ventresca and Mohr, 2002). A turn toward the past can be found in scholarship across many theoretical schools in macro-organizational research, including neo-institutionalism (Hargadon and Douglas, 2001; Leblebici et al., 1991), organizational ecology (Hannan and Freeman, 1987), evolutionary economics (Gort and Klepper, 1982; Nelson and Winter, 1982), and socio-cognitive perspectives (Henderson and Clark, 1990; Tripsas and Gavetti, 2000). Indeed, this research has often included efforts to draw on historical evidence not only from recent decades, but also from the more distant past (Haveman and Rao, 1997) and to examine industries over long spans of time (Tripsas, 1997).The increasing use of data and sources from the past raises the broader question of exactly how historical research and reasoning is valuable in the study of industries. The predominant response to this question in mainstream organizational studies might be described as one focused on the identification of “historical mechanisms,” a perspective that views history as a context for examining theoretically relevant questions about how time and the sequence of organizational events shape the evolution of markets. The research that draws on historical evidence to examine imprinting (Marquis, 2003), evolutionary change (Murmann, 2006; Aldrich and Ruef, 2006), and path dependence