Does access to neighbourhood green space promote a healthy duration of sleep? Novel findings from a cross-sectional study of 259 319 Australians.
Does access to neighbourhood green space promote a healthy duration of sleep? Novel findings from a cross-sectional study of 259 319 Australians.
复制标题
使用邻里绿地是否能促进健康的睡眠时间？ 一项针对 259 319 名澳大利亚人的横断面研究得出的新发现。
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003094
复制
发表时间：
2013-08-13
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Kolt GS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Astell-Burt T;Feng X;Kolt GS
实验表明，置身于公园和其他“绿色空间”能促进良好的心理和生理结果。因此，居住在绿色社区的人睡眠时间短（<6小时）的风险也较低。 这一点可能很重要，因为睡眠时间短与肥胖、慢性病和死亡率相关，但到目前为止，这一假设尚未得到研究。横截面数据分析。澳大利亚新南威尔士州这项研究调查了社区绿色空间是否与259319名在2006年至2009年期间完成45岁及以上研究基线问卷的澳大利亚人的健康睡眠时间（最接近的小时）相关。 采用多项logit回归研究绿色空间的客观测量对睡眠持续时间类别的影响：8小时（正常）; 9至10小时（中长睡眠）;超过10小时（长睡眠）; 6至7小时（中短睡眠）;以及少于6小时（短睡眠）。 模型根据心理困扰、身体活动以及一系列人口统计学和社会经济学特征进行了调整。生活在绿色社区的人报告说，睡眠不足的风险较低。例如，与居住在有20%绿色空间土地使用的地区的参与者相比，有80%+绿色空间的参与者的相对风险比为0.86（95%CI 0.81至0.92），持续时间为6至7小时，睡眠时间小于6小时为0.68（95%CI 0.57至0.80）。 出乎意料的是，更多的绿色空间对实现8小时睡眠的好处并不能通过控制心理困扰、身体活动或其他社会经济因素来解释。 绿色空间规划政策可能比以前认识到的更广泛的公共卫生效益。进一步研究绿色空间在促进健康睡眠持续时间和模式方面的作用是必要的。
Experiments demonstrate that exposure to parks and other ‘green spaces’ promote favourable psychological and physiological outcomes. As a consequence, people who reside in greener neighbourhoods may also have a lower risk of short sleep duration (<6 h). This is potentially important as short sleep duration is a correlate of obesity, chronic disease and mortality, but so far this hypothesis has not been previously investigated. Cross-sectional data analysis. New South Wales, Australia. This study investigated whether neighbourhood green space was associated with a healthier duration of sleep (to the nearest hour) among 259 319 Australians who completed the 45 and Up Study baseline questionnaire between 2006 and 2009 inclusive. Multinomial logit regression was used to investigate the influence of an objective measure of green space on categories of sleep duration: 8 h (normal); between 9 and 10 h (mid-long sleep); over 10 h (long sleep); between 6 and 7 h (mid-short sleep); and less than 6 h (short sleep). Models were adjusted for psychological distress, physical activity and a range of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. People living in greener neighbourhoods reported a lower risk of short sleep. For example, compared with participants living in areas with 20% green space land-use, the relative risk ratios for participants with 80%+ green space was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.92) for durations between 6 and 7 h, and 0.68 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.80) for less than 6 h sleep. Unexpectedly, the benefit of more green space for achieving 8 h of sleep was not explained by controls for psychological distress, physical activity or other socioeconomic factors. Green space planning policies may have wider public health benefits than previously recognised. Further research in the role of green spaces in promoting healthier sleep durations and patterns is warranted.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Hug, Stella-Maria;Hartig, Terry;Hornung, Rainer
通讯作者：
Hornung, Rainer
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
KOENIG, HG;WESTLUND, RE;HYBELS, C
通讯作者：
HYBELS, C
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Francis, Jacinta;Wood, Lisa J.;Giles-Corti, Billie
通讯作者：
Giles-Corti, Billie
DOI：
10.1068/a35111
发表时间：
2003-10-01
期刊：
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A
影响因子：
--
作者：
de Vries, S;Verheij, RA;Spreeuwenberg, P
通讯作者：
Spreeuwenberg, P
影响因子：
120.7
作者：
FORD, DE;KAMEROW, DB
通讯作者：
KAMEROW, DB