Status of open access in the biomedical field in 2005
Status of open access in the biomedical field in 2005
复制标题
DOI：
10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.002
复制
发表时间：
2009-01-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Ueda, Shuichi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Matsubayashi, Mamiko;Kurata, Keiko;Ueda, Shuichi
目的：方法：利用PubMed数据库，对2005年生物医学领域开放存取的文献进行统计分析。然后使用PubMed、Google Scholar、Google和OAIster来建立这些出版物的免费全文在线可用性。文章进行了分析的OA类型，国家，文章类型，影响因子，出版商和出版模式，以提供洞察到目前的状态OA.Results：27%的所有文章可访问的OA文章。超过70%的OA论文通过期刊网站提供。中等商业出版商通常在OA期刊上提供OA文章，而社会出版商倾向于在传统订阅模式的背景下提供OA文章。从个人作者的网站或在机构存储库的OA文章的速度是相当低的。讨论/结论：在2005年，OA在生物医学领域实现了现有的学术交流系统的保护伞下。通常情况下，OA文章作为学术团体出版的订阅期刊的一部分发表。BioMed Central发表的OA期刊贡献了所有OA文章的一小部分。
Objectives: This study was designed to document the state of open access (OA) in the biomedical field in 2005.Methods: PubMed was used to collect bibliographic data on target articles published in 2005. PubMed, Google Scholar, Google, and OAIster were then used to establish the availability of free full text online for these publications. Articles were analyzed by type of OA, country, type of article, impact factor, publisher, and publishing model to provide insight into the current state of OA.Results: Twenty-seven percent of all the articles were accessible as OA articles. More than 70% of the OA articles were provided through journal websites. Midrank commercial publishers often provided OA articles in OA journals, while society publishers tended to provide OA articles in the context of a traditional subscription model. The rate of OA articles available from the websites of individual authors or in institutional repositories was quite low.Discussion/Conclusions: In 2005, OA in the biomedical field was achieved under an umbrella of existing scholarly communication systems. Typically, OA articles were published as part of subscription journals published by scholarly societies. OA journals published by BioMed Central contributed to a small portion of all OA articles.