A CHILDRENS SOCIAL DESIRABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE

A CHILDRENS SOCIAL DESIRABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/h0020966
复制
发表时间:
1965-01-01
期刊:
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
KATKOVSKY, W
KATKOVSKY, W
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
CRANDALL, VC;CRANDALL, VJ;KATKOVSKY, W

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

儿童的社会可取性(CSD)问卷的编制和管理,956名学生在3,4,5,6,8,10,12年级。一个直接的问题(“是-否”)的规模形式,在第三,第四,第五年级的儿童在个人测试会议,和一个真-假的形式,在小组会议上给予老年人。对于这两种形式的问卷,分半信度和重测(1个月的间隔)的可靠性高。社会理想的反应,更频繁地给予年幼的儿童比年长的儿童,由迟钝的学生比聪明的学生,由女孩比男孩,由黑人儿童比由白色儿童。社会阶层,家庭规模和顺序位置与CSD反应无关。有人提出了一些问题,这些问题涉及这一回应的一般性,以及这种社会可取性衡量标准以及Crowne和Marlowe的衡量标准所依据的前提。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2016阿帕,保留所有权利)
A Children's Social Desirability (CSD) questionnaire was constructed and administered to 956 Ss in Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12. A direct question (" yes-no") form of the scale was presented to children in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades in individual testing sessions, and a true-false form was given older Ss in group sessions. For both forms of the questionnaire, split-half reliabilities and test-retest (1-month interval) reliabilities were high. Socially desirable responses were more frequently given by younger children than by older children, by dull Ss than by bright Ss, by girls than by boys, and by Negro children than by white children. Social class, size of family, and ordinal position were not associated with CSD responses. Questions were raised pertaining to the generality of this response and pertaining to the premises on which this measure of social desirability, as well as that of Crowne and Marlowe, is based.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)