Assessing tension metrics with dark energy survey and Planck data

Assessing tension metrics with dark energy survey and Planck data
复制标题

DOI：
10.1093/mnras/stab1670
复制
发表时间：
2020-12
期刊：
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
P. Lemos;M. Raveri;A. Campos;Y. Park;C. Chang;N. Weaverdyck;D. Huterer;A. Liddle;J. Blazek;R. Cawthon;A. Choi;J. DeRose;S. Dodelson;C. Doux;M. Gatti;D. Gruen;I. Harrison;E. Krause;O. Lahav;N. MacCrann;J. Muir;J. Prat;M. Rau;R. Rollins;S. Samuroff;J. Zuntz;W. Hartley;B. Hoyle;I. Sevilla-Noarbe;M. Troxel;M. Aguena;S. Allam;J. Annis;S. Ávila;D. Bacon;G. Bernstein;E. Bertin;D. Brooks;D. Burke;A. Rosell;M. Kind;J. Carretero;C. Conselice;M. Costanzi;M. Crocce;M. Pereira;J. Vicente;S. Desai;H. Diehl;P. Doel;K. Eckert;T. Eifler;J. Elvin-Poole;S. Everett;A. Evrard;I. Ferrero;A. Fert'e;B. Flaugher;P. Fosalba;J. Frieman;J. Garc'ia-Bellido;E. Gaztañaga;D. Gerdes;T. Giannantonio;R. Gruendl;J. Gschwend;G. Gutiérrez;S. Hinton;D. Hollowood;K. Honscheid;E. Huff;D. James;M. Jarvis;M. Lima;M. Maia;M. March;J. Marshall;P. Martini;Peter Melchior;F. Menanteau;R. Miquel;J. Mohr;R. Morgan;J. Myles;R. Ogando;A. Palmese;S. Pandey;F. Paz-Chinch'on;A. Plazas;M. Rodríguez-Monroy;A. Roodman;E. Sánchez;V. Scarpine;M. Schubnell;L. Secco;S. Serrano;M. Smith;M. Soares-Santos;E. Suchyta;M. Swanson;G. Tarlé;D. Thomas;C. To;T. Varga;J. Weller;W. Wester
P. Lemos;M. Raveri;A. Campos;Y. Park;C. Chang;N. Weaverdyck;D. Huterer;A. Liddle;J. Blazek;R. Cawthon;A. Choi;J. DeRose;S. Dodelson;C. Doux;M. Gatti;D. Gruen;I. Harrison;E. Krause;O. Lahav;N. MacCrann;J. Muir;J. Prat;M. Rau;R. Rollins;S. Samuroff;J. Zuntz;W. Hartley;B. Hoyle;I. Sevilla-Noarbe;M. Troxel;M. Aguena;S. Allam;J. Annis;S. Ávila;D. Bacon;G. Bernstein;E. Bertin;D. Brooks;D. Burke;A. Rosell;M. Kind;J. Carretero;C. Conselice;M. Costanzi;M. Crocce;M. Pereira;J. Vicente;S. Desai;H. Diehl;P. Doel;K. Eckert;T. Eifler;J. Elvin-Poole;S. Everett;A. Evrard;I. Ferrero;A. Fert'e;B. Flaugher;P. Fosalba;J. Frieman;J. Garc'ia-Bellido;E. Gaztañaga;D. Gerdes;T. Giannantonio;R. Gruendl;J. Gschwend;G. Gutiérrez;S. Hinton;D. Hollowood;K. Honscheid;E. Huff;D. James;M. Jarvis;M. Lima;M. Maia;M. March;J. Marshall;P. Martini;Peter Melchior;F. Menanteau;R. Miquel;J. Mohr;R. Morgan;J. Myles;R. Ogando;A. Palmese;S. Pandey;F. Paz-Chinch'on;A. Plazas;M. Rodríguez-Monroy;A. Roodman;E. Sánchez;V. Scarpine;M. Schubnell;L. Secco;S. Serrano;M. Smith;M. Soares-Santos;E. Suchyta;M. Swanson;G. Tarlé;D. Thomas;C. To;T. Varga;J. Weller;W. Wester
中科院分区：
物理与天体物理2区
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Lemos;M. Raveri;A. Campos;Y. Park;C. Chang;N. Weaverdyck;D. Huterer;A. Liddle;J. Blazek;R. Cawthon;A. Choi;J. DeRose;S. Dodelson;C. Doux;M. Gatti;D. Gruen;I. Harrison;E. Krause;O. Lahav;N. MacCrann;J. Muir;J. Prat;M. Rau;R. Rollins;S. Samuroff;J. Zuntz;W. Hartley;B. Hoyle;I. Sevilla-Noarbe;M. Troxel;M. Aguena;S. Allam;J. Annis;S. Ávila;D. Bacon;G. Bernstein;E. Bertin;D. Brooks;D. Burke;A. Rosell;M. Kind;J. Carretero;C. Conselice;M. Costanzi;M. Crocce;M. Pereira;J. Vicente;S. Desai;H. Diehl;P. Doel;K. Eckert;T. Eifler;J. Elvin-Poole;S. Everett;A. Evrard;I. Ferrero;A. Fert'e;B. Flaugher;P. Fosalba;J. Frieman;J. Garc'ia-Bellido;E. Gaztañaga;D. Gerdes;T. Giannantonio;R. Gruendl;J. Gschwend;G. Gutiérrez;S. Hinton;D. Hollowood;K. Honscheid;E. Huff;D. James;M. Jarvis;M. Lima;M. Maia;M. March;J. Marshall;P. Martini;Peter Melchior;F. Menanteau;R. Miquel;J. Mohr;R. Morgan;J. Myles;R. Ogando;A. Palmese;S. Pandey;F. Paz-Chinch'on;A. Plazas;M. Rodríguez-Monroy;A. Roodman;E. Sánchez;V. Scarpine;M. Schubnell;L. Secco;S. Serrano;M. Smith;M. Soares-Santos;E. Suchyta;M. Swanson;G. Tarlé;D. Thomas;C. To;T. Varga;J. Weller;W. Wester

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

量化张力——不同实验测量的宇宙学参数之间的不一致性——已经成为现代宇宙学数据分析的关键部分。两个实验或宇宙探测器之间的统计上显著的紧张关系可能表明新的物理学超出了标准的宇宙模型，需要及时识别。我们将文献中提出的几种张力估计应用于暗能量测量（DES）大尺度结构测量和普朗克宇宙微波背景数据。我们首先使用合成的DES数据评估这些指标对两者之间人为引入的输入张力的响应性。然后，我们将这些指标应用于普朗克和实际的DES 1年数据的比较。我们发现参数差异、特征度和怀疑度指标在模拟和真实数据上都产生了相似的结果，而贝叶斯比由于依赖于先验体积而与其他指标不一致。使用这些指标，我们计算了DES Year 1 3 × 2pt和普朗克之间的张力，发现在ΛCDM范式下的调查处于~ 2.3σ张力。这套指标提供了一个工具集，用于在DES 3年及以后的数据中可靠地测试张力。
Quantifying tensions – inconsistencies amongst measurements of cosmological parameters by different experiments – has emerged as a crucial part of modern cosmological data analysis. Statistically significant tensions between two experiments or cosmological probes may indicate new physics extending beyond the standard cosmological model and need to be promptly identified. We apply several tension estimators proposed in the literature to the dark energy survey (DES) large-scale structure measurement and Planck cosmic microwave background data. We first evaluate the responsiveness of these metrics to an input tension artificially introduced between the two, using synthetic DES data. We then apply the metrics to the comparison of Planck and actual DES Year 1 data. We find that the parameter differences, Eigentension, and Suspiciousness metrics all yield similar results on both simulated and real data, while the Bayes ratio is inconsistent with the rest due to its dependence on the prior volume. Using these metrics, we calculate the tension between DES Year 1 3 × 2pt and Planck, finding the surveys to be in ∼2.3σ tension under the ΛCDM paradigm. This suite of metrics provides a toolset for robustly testing tensions in the DES Year 3 data and beyond.