Rethinking Panethnicity and the Race-immigration Divide

Rethinking Panethnicity and the Race-immigration Divide
复制标题

重新思考泛种族和种族移民鸿沟

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jennifer A. Jones
Jennifer A. Jones
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. Brown;Jennifer A. Jones

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

尽管人口结构的变化继续引发人们对移民的种族变革效应的兴趣,但研究人员经常感叹种族和移民奖学金之间缺乏对话。我们使用最近的研究泛种族来说明这两个子领域之间存在的概念分歧。泛种族研究为群体身份的形成和政治动员提供了新的视角,但我们认为,它与种族化研究存在问题。泛种族学者大多认为种族化和泛种族群体的形成是独立的过程,后者依次跟随前者。在这篇文章中,我们认为,这种分析的区别既反映和具体化的种族和移民研究之间的鸿沟,并产生一个不完整的理解组的形成过程。我们提出了一个ethnoracialization模型,以显示如何可以重新配置泛种族的概念,以开发一个强大的帐户组的形成,并弥合种族和移民研究之间的鸿沟。
Although demographic shifts continue to spark interest in the racially transformative effects of immigration, researchers routinely lament the lack of dialogue between race and immigration scholarship. We use recent research on panethnicity to illustrate the conceptual divides that exist between the two subfields. Panethnicity research has shed new light on the formation of group identities and political mobilization, but we contend that it is problematically divorced from research on racialization. Panethnicity scholars largely view racialization and panethnic group formation as separate processes, with the latter sequentially following the former. In this article, we argue that this analytical distinction both reflects and reifies the divide between race and immigration research and yields an incomplete understanding of the group formation process. We propose an ethnoracialization model to show how the concept of panethnicity can be reconfigured to develop a robust account of group formation and to bridge the much-lamented divide between race and immigration research.