A meta-analysis of the situational interview: An enumerative review of reasons for its validity
A meta-analysis of the situational interview: An enumerative review of reasons for its validity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/h0086826
复制
发表时间：
1999-02-01
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Sue-Chan, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Latham, GP;Sue-Chan, C
情境背后的前提。面试（SI）是意图预测行为。SI的显著特征包括在面试问题中描述困境，使用项目评分指南，以及对项目进行总结性评分以得出总面试分数。荟萃分析表明，SI的加权平均观察到的标准相关有效性为0.35（n = 1010），平均校正的标准相关有效性为0.47。文献的枚举审查显示，SI适用于各种工作，参与者，绩效标准和国家。标准相关的验证证据SI的内容，结构和增量效度，自由采访者的偏见，和实用性方面的解释。文章最后比较SI的面试，测量过去的行为或未来的意图，面试的问题不包含一个困境或评分指南，和性能尺寸，而不是每个单独的项目进行评分。
The premise underlying the situational. interview (SI) is that intentions predict behaviour. The distinguishing characteristics of the SI include the depiction of a dilemma in the interview question, the use of an item scoring guide, and summative scoring of items to yield a total interview score. A meta-analysis indicated that the weighted mean observed criterion-related validity of the SI is .35 (n = 1010), and the mean corrected criterion-related validity is .47. An enumerative review of the literature revealed that the SI is applicable across a diversity of jobs, participants, performance criteria, and countries. The criterion-related validation evidence for the SI is explained in terms of content, construct, and incremental validity, freedom from interviewer biases, and practicality. The article concludes with a comparison of the SI to interviews that measure either past behaviours or future intentions where the interview question does not contain a dilemma or scoring guide, and performance dimensions rather than each individual item are scored.