Synthesis of the literature on the effectiveness of regional anesthesia for cataract surgery.
Synthesis of the literature on the effectiveness of regional anesthesia for cataract surgery.
复制标题
白内障手术区域麻醉有效性文献综述。
DOI:
10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00597-2
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
影响因子:
13.7
通讯作者:
Schein,OD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Friedman,DS;Bass,EB;Lubomski,LH;Fleisher,LA;Kempen,JH;Magaziner,J;Sprintz,M;Robinson,K;Schein,OD
OBJECTIVETo synthesize the findings of the randomized trials of regional anesthesia management strategies for cataract surgery.DESIGNLiterature review and analysis.METHODThe authors performed a systematic search of the literature to identify all articles pertaining to regional anesthesia during cataract surgery on adults. One investigator abstracted the content of each article onto a custom-designed form. A second investigator corroborated the findings. The evidence supporting the anesthesia approaches was graded by consensus as good, fair, poor, or insufficient.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESEvidence supporting the effectiveness of different forms of regional anesthesia.RESULTSThere was good evidence that retrobulbar and peribulbar blocks provide equivalent akinesia and pain control during cataract surgery. Additionally, sub-Tenon’s blocks were at least as effective as retrobulbar and peribulbar blocks. There was good evidence that retrobulbar block provides better pain control during surgery than topical anesthesia, and there was fair evidence that peribulbar block provides better pain control than topical anesthesia.CONCLUSIONSThis synthesis of the literature demonstrates that currently used approaches to anesthesia management provide adequate pain control for successful cataract surgery, but there is some variation in the effectiveness of the most commonly used techniques. Data are needed on patient preferences to determine the optimal strategies for anesthesia management during cataract surgery.