Framing disaster resilience The implications of the diverse conceptualisations of "bouncing back"
Framing disaster resilience The implications of the diverse conceptualisations of "bouncing back"
复制标题
DOI：
10.1108/dpm-07-2013-0130
复制
发表时间：
2014-01-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Howden, Mark
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aldunce, Paulina;Beilin, Ruth;Howden, Mark
目的-为应对灾害日益严重的破坏性影响和气候变化对灾害风险管理构成的挑战，必须进一步发展灾害风险管理。弹性方法正在成为实现这一目标的一种方法，并且在过去十年中已被大力引入政策领域，尽管它对DRM从业者和研究人员来说并不新鲜。然而，弹性是一个非常有争议的问题，并且没有一致同意的定义，这导致利益相关者在将其应用于实践时感到困惑。因此，本文的目的是探讨研究人员和DRM实践者是如何构建弹性的。设计/方法论/方法-采用Hajer的“社会互动话语理论”作为分析框架，结合对政府文件的分析、对实践者的深度访谈以及对澳大利亚昆士兰州自然灾害恢复计划背景下的实地和实践的观察。研究发现——其中一个关键发现是，“反弹”的概念是弹性话语的核心，但对这一概念的不同解释导致了现实世界的影响。从这项研究中，从业者构建灾难恢复意义的三种不同方式（故事情节）出现了。重要的是，这些故事情节之间的差异揭示了发生重构的可能性，这些可能导致不同的政策选择和做法。原创性/价值——本文提出的结果为如何理解弹性提供了实证证据，有助于扩展弹性理论，并为DRM和弹性实践提供信息。
Purpose - To confront the increasingly devastating impacts of disasters and the challenges that climate change is posing to disaster risk management (DRM) there is an imperative to further develop DRM. The resilience approach is emerging as one way to do this, and in the last decade has been strongly introduced into the policy arena, although it is not new for DRM practitioners and researchers. Nevertheless, resilience is a highly contested issue, and there is no agreed definition of it, which has resulted in confusion for stakeholders when applying it to practice. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how resilience is framed by researchers and DRM practitioners.Design/methodology/approach - The analytical framework used was Hajer's "social-interactive discourse theory", combined with analysis of government documents, in-depth interviews with practitioners and observation of field and practices within the context of the Natural Disaster Resilience Program in Queensland, Australia.Findings - One of the key findings is that the idea of "bouncing back" is central to the resilience discourse but different interpretations of this idea results in real-world implications. Three different ways (storylines) in which practitioners construct the meaning of disaster resilience emerge from this study. Importantly the divergences between these storylines reveal possibilities for reframing to occur and these could lead to different policy options and practices.Originality/value - The results presented in this paper offer empirical evidence on how resilience is understood on the ground, contributing to extending resilience theory and informing DRM and resilience practice.