The Survey of Gifted Students' Scientific Integrity and Perception of Scientific Misconduct in R&E Program

The Survey of Gifted Students' Scientific Integrity and Perception of Scientific Misconduct in R&E Program
复制标题

资优学生科学诚信调查及对 R 科学不端行为的看法

DOI:
10.9722/jgte.2015.25.4.565
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Jung Bog Kim
Jung Bog Kim
中科院分区:
教育学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jiwon Lee;Jung Bog Kim

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

调查了资优学生的科研诚信、科研不端行为知觉和科研伦理教育需求。在本研究中,267名参加R&E项目的理工学院学生对这三个部分进行了问卷调查。主要研究结果如下:第一,45.31%的资优学生回答他们有过五个类别的一次或多次经历:捏造、伪造、抄袭、不公正的作者和纵容科学不端行为。其次,近90%的资优学生回答说,除了自我抄袭外,陈述问题是科学不端行为。第三,28.83%的资优学生需要学习研究伦理学,他们都是一年级学生。第四,他们想具体了解APT引用的限度、研究笔记的写作技巧、科学不端行为的具体例子、以及科学诚信的具体行动方法等。为了让资优学生负责任地进行他们的研究,教育工作者必须考虑和反映资优学生的声音。
We investigated gifted students' scientific integrity, perception of scientific misconduct and needs for research ethics education. For this study, 267 science academy students who have participated in R&E program responded to questionnaire of those three parts. The major findings are as follows: First, 45.31% of gifted students answered that they had one or more experiences in five categories; fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, unfair authorship, and connivance of scientific misconduct. Second, almost 90% of gifted students responded that statements of questions are scientific misconduct except the self plagiarism. Third, 28.83% of gifted students needed to study research ethics and all of them were 1st graders. Fourth, they wanted to know specifically the limit of apt citation, writing skills of research notes, specific examples of scientific misconduct, and concrete acting method for scientific integrity, etc. In order to get gifted students to conduct their research responsibly, educators have to consider and reflect the voice of gifted students.