Interpretivism and the analysis of traditions and practices
Interpretivism and the analysis of traditions and practices
复制标题
解释主义以及对传统和实践的分析
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Rhodes
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Bevir;R. Rhodes
我们必须感谢亨德里克·瓦格纳尔不仅对我们的工作作了慷慨的评论，而且还感谢他花时间和麻烦以如此有益的方式参与我们的工作。我们寻求以同样的精神作出回应。尽管他提出了几个小的理论批评，但他主要担心的是，很少有实证工作。他主张对治理进行一种“表演性”的描述。我们简要评论对实践和传统的哲学分析，然后提请注意一系列广泛的实证研究，并突出我们的核心书籍。最后，我们反思了记录传统的困难，并将瓦格纳对表演的强调与我们对讲故事的描述进行了比较。
We must thank Hendrik Wagenaar not only for his for his generous comments on our work but also for taking the time and trouble to engage with it in such a helpful way. We seek to respond in the same spirit. Although he makes a couple of small theoretical criticisms, his main concern is that there is little empirical work. He argues for a ‘performative’ account of governance. We comment briefly on the philosophical analysis of practices and traditions, before drawing attention to a broad set of empirical studies and highlighting our core books. Finally, we reflect on the difficulties of documenting traditions, and we compare Wagenaar’s emphasis on performance with our account of storytelling.