Still puzzled by adjectival passives
Still puzzled by adjectival passives
复制标题
仍然对形容词被动语态感到困惑
DOI：
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0010
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
0.5
通讯作者：
B. Gehrke
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Gehrke
对于英语和德语等语言，公认的观点是，在形容词被动句中，潜在动词的外部论元在句法上不是主动的，因为它缺乏对目的从句的控制，也没有不相交的指称效果。1在这两个方面，动词被动句的表现不同，导致得出结论，即使没有副短语，外部论元也存在于句法中(参见。贝克等人。；克拉泽，1994年等)。德语说明了这一点，在德语中，形容词被动和动词被动之间存在形态上的差异，前者将过去分词与sein‘be’((1-a)，(2-a))结合在一起，后者与weden‘to’((1-b)，(2-b))一起出现。
The received view for languages like English and German is that in adjectival passives the external argument of the underlying verb is not syntactically active, based on its lack of control into purpose clauses and the absence of the disjoint reference effect.1 In both respects, verbal passives behave differently, leading to the conclusion that the external argument is present in the syntax, even in the absence of by-phrases (cf. Baker et al. 1989; Kratzer 1994, among others). This is illustrated by German, in which a morphological difference is made between adjectival passives, which combine a past participle with sein ‘be’ ((1-a), (2-a)), and verbal passives, which appear with werden ‘become’ ((1-b), (2-b)).