Toward a Theory of Minimally Rational Argument: Analyses of Episode-Specific Effects of Argument Structures.
Toward a Theory of Minimally Rational Argument: Analyses of Episode-Specific Effects of Argument Structures.
复制标题
走向最低理性论证理论：论证结构的特定情节影响的分析。
DOI：
10.1080/03637759509376357
复制
发表时间：
1995
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Harry Weger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Canary;Jeanette E. Brossmann;Brent Brossmann;Harry Weger
公共话语中的论证研究长期以来在传播学领域占据着重要地位，而人际环境中的论证研究则是最近才出现的。这篇文章关注的是论点结构（即，简单的，复杂的，共同制定的，和侵蚀）有关的沟通能力，沟通满意度和吸引力的看法。我们的理论假设将论证描绘为寻求收敛的话语，反映在最低理性结构中。两项研究对如何评价沟通者进行了三角分析。在研究1中，夫妻的争论行为的观察与适当性，有效性，合理性和沟通满意度的措施。结果表明，在能力的看法，人们积极评价更高比例的联合建设和复杂的参数，而他们消极评价更高比例的未开发的点和侵蚀的参数。在研究2中，实验室...
Whereas the investigation of argument in public discourse has long held prominent status in the field of communication, research on argument in interpersonal settings has only recently emerged. This article concerns how argument structures (i.e., simple, complex, jointly enacted, and eroded) are related to perceptions of communicator competence, communication satisfaction, and attraction. Our theoretic assumptions portray argument as convergence‐seeking discourse that is reflected in minimally rational structures. Two studies triangulate on how communicators are evaluated. In Study 1, observations of couples' argument behaviors are correlated with measures of appropriateness, effectiveness, reasonableness, and communication satisfaction. Results reveal that, in terms of competence perceptions, people positively evaluate higher proportions of jointly constructed and complex arguments, whereas they negatively assess higher proportions of undeveloped points and eroded arguments. In Study 2, experimentally ma...