A preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effect of biological sex in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury.
A preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effect of biological sex in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury.
复制标题
临床前系统评价和荟萃分析,评估生物性别对脂多糖诱导的急性肺损伤的影响。
DOI:
10.1152/ajplung.00336.2023
复制
发表时间:
2024
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lalu,ManojM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kuhar,Eva;Chander,Nikesh;Stewart,DuncanJ;Jahandideh,Forough;Zhang,Haibo;Kristof,ArnoldS;Bastarache,JulieA;Schmidt,EricP;Taljaard,Monica;Thébaud,Bernard;Engelberts,Doreen;Fergusson,DeanA;Lalu,ManojM
It is unclear what effect biological sex has on outcomes of acute lung injury (ALI). Clinical studies are confounded by their observational design. We addressed this knowledge gap with a preclinical systematic review of ALI animal studies. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies of intratracheal/intranasal/aerosolized lipopolysaccharide administration (the most common ALI model) that reported sex-stratified data. Screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate. Our primary outcome was histological tissue injury and secondary outcomes included alveolar-capillary barrier alterations and inflammatory markers. We used a random-effects inverse variance meta-analysis, expressing data as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool. We identified six studies involving 132 animals across 11 independent experiments. A total of 41 outcomes were extracted, with the direction of effect suggesting greater severity in males than females in 26/41 outcomes (63%). One study reported on lung histology and found that male mice exhibited greater injury than females (SMD: 1.61, 95% CI: 0.53–2.69). Meta-analysis demonstrated significantly elevated albumin levels (SMD: 2.17, 95% CI: 0.63–3.70) and total cell counts (SMD: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.27–1.33) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from male mice compared with female mice. Most studies had an “unclear risk of bias.” Our findings suggest sex-related differences in ALI severity. However, these conclusions are drawn from a small number of animals and studies. Further research is required to address the fundamental issue of biological sex differences in LPS-induced ALI.